alphacyberranger to World NewsEnglish • 1 year agoIBM promised to back off facial recognition — then it signed a $69.8 million contract to provide itwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square14arrow-up1313arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1309arrow-down1external-linkIBM promised to back off facial recognition — then it signed a $69.8 million contract to provide itwww.theverge.comalphacyberranger to World NewsEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square14cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@NounsAndWordslinkEnglish10•1 year agoSo protected broadly under the second amendment instead of protected broadly under the first amendment?
minus-square@NounsAndWordslinkEnglish1•1 year agoYes, yes, but this isn’t harmful speech military AI, this is simply commercial AI sold at scale. Clearly different, and if not, our lawyers will argue that it is until after we’ve made all our money.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoHm. So it’s okay for the US government to spy on its citizens but no one else? Not sure why people like you ever bother talking about privacy. You clearly don’t care about it or understand it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year ago No its not but at least the shit doesn’t get sold to whoever pays the most Do you have evidence of this happening in China?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year ago And i care very much about privacy. Then you should know it’s not a ‘lesser evil’ scenario. Either you have privacy, or you don’t. Choosing who you give up your privacy for is not being private.
So protected broadly under the second amendment instead of protected broadly under the first amendment?
Removed by mod
Yes, yes, but this isn’t
harmful speechmilitary AI, this is simply commercial AI sold at scale. Clearly different, and if not, our lawyers will argue that it is until after we’ve made all our money.Hm. So it’s okay for the US government to spy on its citizens but no one else?
Not sure why people like you ever bother talking about privacy. You clearly don’t care about it or understand it.
Removed by mod
Do you have evidence of this happening in China?
Then you should know it’s not a ‘lesser evil’ scenario. Either you have privacy, or you don’t.
Choosing who you give up your privacy for is not being private.