• @OriginalUsername
    link
    English
    12
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A few errors

    • 130TWh is the final electricity consumption, not the generation. Since Sweden is a big net exporter of electricity, there is a big difference
    • I’m not sure what macrotrends refers to by “Fossil fuel consumption”, but it’s pobably referring to raw energy rather than electricity (which doesnt consider conversion efficiency)
    • In reality, sweden uses almost no fossil fuels in its electricity mix, and that is in large part due to nuclear
    • KWh and KW, not KW and KW/h
    • In your calculations you failed to account for capacity factors. Wind plants have average capacity factors of about 42% in sweden, so the capacity would need to be over double the consumption, even ignoring the variability of consumption and production

    Nevertheless, I do agree that Sweden doesn’t need more nuclear. It already generates some of the cleanest electricity in the world and I’d imagine fossil fuels are really only used for peak load.

    • @gmtom
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      Thank you for the corrections!