The Dalton Police Department asked the GBI to investigate after Alexis Sluder, 16, of Ellijay, died while in custody at the Dalton Youth Detention Center in August 2022.
    Authorities did not specify what Sluder was charged with. [Why is that the first question asked? It’s irrelevant.]
    The GBI said a Whitfield County grand jury handed up an indictment against five DJJ employees tied to Sluder’s death and have been charged with the following:
        • Maveis Brooks, sergeant, age 35, of Calhoun, GA – 2 counts of first-degree cruelty to children and 1 count of second-degree cruelty to children
        • Russell Ballard, cadet, age 62, of Chatsworth, GA – 2 counts of first-degree cruelty to children and 1 count of second-degree cruelty to children
        • Rebecka Phillips, officer, age 45, of Chatsworth, GA – 2 counts of first-degree cruelty to children and 1 count of second-degree cruelty to children
        • Monica Hedrick, nurse, age 62, Ringgold, GA – 1 count of second-degree cruelty to children
        • David McKinney, Detention Center Director, age 53, of Rome, GA – 1 count of second-degree cruelty to children
    [It’s been more than a year, but] The GBI has not released Sluder’s cause of death or much other information about this case.

  • blanketswithsmallpox
    link
    fedilink
    -91 year ago

    Imma go with the much more uninteresting and common suicide.

    Gag laws regarding juveniles are there for a reason.

    • Doug HollandOP
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      “Gag laws regarding juveniles” — one of many, many things I know nothing about and haven’t given much thought to.

      Some HIPAA-like privacy rules for info about kids in custody seems sensible, but the article says “GBI has not released Sluder’s cause of death or much other information about this case,” when she’s been dead for a year. I would think/hope an investigation outranks any gag rules.

      • blanketswithsmallpox
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The only people privy to that info are parents, medical staff, and investigators (+ grandy jury).

        If the reporters want to know info and the parents or guardians aren’t telling them, then they’re SoL.

        Which is EXACTLY how this should be.

        • Doug HollandOP
          link
          English
          -11 year ago

          Why?

          What’s the advantage of making sure the facts are known only to parents, medical staff, and investigators?

            • QuinceDaPence
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              But the actions of public servants that result in the death of a child absolutely is everyones business.

              If they’re trying to protect privacy, give the details, and keep the name redacted.

              • blanketswithsmallpox
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                … hence the grand jury… What aren’t people getting about how this isn’t ACTIVELY what’s happening?

                And like before, it deals with juveniles, so all data is locked up tight. It’s a whole different world of legality in numerous ways.

                • QuinceDaPence
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  But the purpose of sealing records on minors is so that it doing stupid stuff as a kid has limited effect later in life. She’s dead, so there’s no reason to keep it sealed other than shielding from public scrutiny.

                  I understand there’s a grand jury, but until it’s released to the public I’ll follow what’s worked pretty well for me so far and assume the worst about the police/government until proven otherwise.

                  • Doug HollandOP
                    link
                    English
                    01 year ago

                    I love it when someone explains what I’m thinking so much more clearly than what I’m thinking. :) Thanks.