Driverless Taxis Blocked Ambulance Response to Fatal Accident, San Francisco Fire Dept. Says
www.nytimes.com
Two Cruise taxis delayed an ambulance carrying a car accident victim to a hospital, a department report said. The company said it was not at fault.

Two Cruise driverless taxis blocked an ambulance carrying a critically injured patient who later died at a hospital, a San Francisco Fire Department report said, in another incident involving self-driving cars in the city.

On Aug. 14, two Cruise autonomous vehicles were stopped in the right two lanes of a four-lane, one-way street in the SoMa neighborhood, where the victim was found, according to the department report. It said that a police vehicle in another lane had to be moved in order for the ambulance to leave.

  • Flying Squid
    2•1 year ago

    If I’m injured, am carrying bulky stuff, or am trying to hit up a part of town that would take too long with public transport, an AV EV could be a good solution.

    Why not a car share instead? Or just an Uber?

    • GhostalmediaEnglish
      -3•1 year ago

      Because the goal is to have an Uber that removes human error.

      • Flying Squid
        3•1 year ago

        I’d say this article shows that error is still a problem.

        • GhostalmediaEnglish
          2•1 year ago

          It very much is, but the errors are different. An AV isn’t going to get distracted by their phone, by an argument, by rubbernecking, etc. But an AV might encounter something that the sensor AI is confused by, and the cars might Mitch McConnell themselves in the middle of the road. So far at-fault accidents are way down with the AVs, but stalls are way up.

          • Flying Squid
            1•1 year ago

            Thank you, that at least is a good argument.