• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    People hate it, but as someone who leans towards fuck-cars, well sign-posted automated traffic cameras remove this problem. Stop cops from chasing people in cars like some dumb movie, and endanger both parties by parking on the freeway - just mail them a ticket.

    • @44razorsedge
      link
      101 year ago

      So an automated speed trap is the solution? That’s just a flat tax. And for the wealthy it’s not even an inconvenience, just the cost of driving as they please.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        it is, yes. I don’t think that’s an issue because a lot of countries that use it also couple it with a system that if you continuously break the law there are further sanctions

        • @hark
          link
          71 year ago

          “Just don’t speed”

          Meanwhile in reality they can craft these traps to maximize revenue by doing things like changing speed limits for specific sections of the same road for no apparent reason other than to charge people for speeding.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            In addition to your point, there are certain places (I’m looking at you, Houston) where a whole lot of people just have paper tags. They’re all faked. So where are we sending those tickets?

            There are also a load of unregistered motorcycles with plates from three owners ago. It’s not their fault that no one bothered to register after that.

            TXTag tried sending me bills for someone who bought my car after I traded it in. I proved it was no longer mine. They dropped those charges. Then it started over the next time whoever owns the car drove on their tollway. Went on for two years.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -11 year ago

              I’m sure long-term they will improve the system and things like this will happen less and less. I’m sorry that happened to you, but it doesn’t mean the idea as a whole is bad.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  I’m literally arguing against privatization in the adjacent post. Again, this is not productive discourse. “Burn everything down” isn’t a realistic or helpful suggestion.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -31 year ago

            What you’re describing may be an issue. I suspect it is a tiny minority of the speeding tickets written. The above poster is advocating for well advertised limits and automated ticketing. I think this is a very reasonable solution to an undeniable problem: driving is dangerous, speeding more so.

            The situation your describing a contrived edge case and is not a valuable contribution to the discussion at this stage.

            “Just don’t speed” is, by and large, a very reasonable thing to ask of drivers.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I read the article second article, the first is paywalled. I still think cameras are a good solution. The argument in the article sounds a lot like “some police are bad, we shoud disband the police” or “some government officials are greedy, we should disband the government”.

                Frankly, it sounds like the real issue if that they have privitized the production and configuration of the traffic cameras. If there was legislation in place that ensured fair and consistent implementation of the devices much of the issues identified by the author would be moot.

                Any system that we put in place to enforce rules can be abused by those in power, but that doesn’t mean the system is bad or wrong. The reality again is that cars are dangerous, and I argue we should prioritize protecting the public.

                It’s easy to hop in a discussion and say “no that’s bad”, but a lot more productive to say “here’s an alternative”.

                • @hark
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  Privatization is an issue, but also cities or police departments that rely on such revenue will also push for systems that drive revenue since it is a significant portion of their budget. Here’s another piece that explains it: https://www.npr.org/2023/05/09/1174962751/paved-paradise-examines-how-parking-has-changed-the-american-landscape

                  It’s a pretty long piece which covers other aspects of parking, but if you start reading from this excerpt: “GRABAR: I think so. Essentially, parking enforcement serves as a subset of what is now known as revenue-driven policing. And the idea here is that cities take advantage of these parking laws to try and get as much money out of people as possible, but not in the way that you would think, right?” and onward, it covers how underlying problems aren’t solved because the revenue derived from the existing situation is too convenient for the city. They even build around that by giving certain companies discounts on parking tickets because of how often they get them from just trying to do their job.

        • @FlightyPenguin
          link
          31 year ago

          Speeding tickets are a regressive tax. And they won’t get people to hate cars, they’ll get people to hate government.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            they are a tax on speeding and that’s a good thing because speeding causes greater strain on infrastructure.

            also, everyone saying “but rich people won’t be as affected” — but rich people aren’t the majority and this issue occurs with the majority.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -11 year ago

        the residents and the police are both happy with this solution and it exactly describes my proposal, but it seems like you’re using this as proof it’s a bad idea?

        the only criticism is someone saying “it’s a bit of a money grab,” which - yeah, isn’t that the point of capitalism? So is selling bread, water, electricity, internet, books…

        but why I’m proposing it is because it decreases confrontation - in the context of someone being extra judiciously killed by police, so - which would you rather lose, $100? or your life?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          It does nothing to increase safety. Mailing someone a citation after the fact does nothing to stop the crime as it is being done. And, as is the case in Lindale, it doesn’t even make any money as a large majority of the recipients just throw them away.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              I’m speaking from a place of “I drive through Lindale and see this with my own eyes”.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                so we agree its a good thing?

                from your source:

                Last year, 17,300 speeding camera tickets were issued in Linndale — 3,319 fewer than in 2021, according to reports from the Parma Municipal Court.

                or are you arguing speeding in a 25mph zone is a good thing?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  Are you not reading what I said? It doesn’t make the area safer. Receiving a ticket WEEKS after the fact does nothing to prevent or curtail the dangerous behavior WHEN IT IS OCCURRING. And it doesn’t make the actual street any safer because people slow down for that 100yd stretch then speed back up. Never mind the fact that a huge number of the tickets go straight into the trash.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    21 year ago

                    wouldn’t a decrease in tickets imply it is having an effect though?

                    and isn’t slowing down in a dangerous area to speed a provable effect of its success?

                    isn’t someone modifying their behavior after the fact better than not modifying it at all?