• @[email protected]OPM
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    Have you ever had an IQ test or similar? You sometimes get questions like “A car is to transport, what a fork is to ___” with the answer being “cutlery”. It’s not that transport/cutlery or cars/forks have anything in common, it’s about their relationship to the group.

    So in the post it’s saying that “if you think paedophilla is just a type of sexuality, then murdering someone and burying their body is just a type of gardening”. It’s not exactly a flawless comparison, but that’s what they were going for.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      …so I understand where you’re going with this, but I think it is such a poor attempt on his part that I’m still trying to understand it lmao. I guess you’re right, what else could it be really? Still makes no sense to me though.

      • @[email protected]OPM
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Like I said, it’s not the best example but it’s also not the worst one of these I’ve heard, they can get really really obscure. Maybe this is a better explanation/translation:

        “If paedophilla is as trivial as a “sexual orientation”, then burying your dead body in my garden is as trivial as “gardening.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          OH ok yeah your rephrasing here connected the dots, thanks. Hell it’s definitely one of the dumbest I’ve seen, I do not envy you lmao. Thanks for the help on that!

          • @[email protected]OPM
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            No problem, sorry I didn’t make it clearer the first time. Like you said, it’s not the easiest example to (tenuously) explain!