Sjmarf to [email protected] • 1 year agoThanks Googlesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down120
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imageThanks Googlesh.itjust.worksSjmarf to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink18•1 year agoI love how it’s logical, but untrue. A tree might have been planted in 1950 or 2000 but be the same “age” if both were cut after 10 years
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•1 year agoGood point I didn’t even think about the fact you might ask the age of a cut tree which might have not been cut recently.
minus-square@qisopelink5•1 year agois it still a tree if it’s been cut down? at what point does it become simply wood?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 year agoIn some languages, the word for “tree” and the word for “wood” are the same.
I love how it’s logical, but untrue. A tree might have been planted in 1950 or 2000 but be the same “age” if both were cut after 10 years
Good point I didn’t even think about the fact you might ask the age of a cut tree which might have not been cut recently.
is it still a tree if it’s been cut down? at what point does it become simply wood?
In some languages, the word for “tree” and the word for “wood” are the same.