• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Mate, let it go. Ultimately is was 400k I believe?

    The decreased wind tunnel-time and CFD-time do have an impact, so I can’t imagine any advantage from that 400k to still be lasting.

    • *Tagger*
      link
      -31 year ago

      The 400k is a lie. It was over a million. The 400k figure was if they had applied for a tax break they didn’t apply for and had been granted it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        If you are correcting figures one way, you have to correct them both ways. That is how financial auditors always work.

        • *Tagger*
          link
          -11 year ago

          I’m really sorry, please forgive my ignorance, but I don’t know what you mean.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I am a financial accountant in a fairly large company. When external auditors look at the figures, they add up everything that they find. It doesn’t matter if the error is increasing or decreasing the profit-figure, they calculate the total of the errors.

            • *Tagger*
              link
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ah, okay, that makes sense I guess. Seems weird from a lay point of view, but if that’s the industry standard.

              Thanks for explaining.