The US Congress has passed legislation mandating that all agencies of the US Government must turn in any and all information on what they are now calling “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena” (UFOs) to a special committee which will then disseminate the information to the public. Recent Congressional testimony asserts categorically that UAPs exist and that the US Military has been tracking them for decades. The prospect that UFOs are here on Earth has staggering implications that could quite literally change the course of history. Few have been more deeply immersed in the phenomenon of UFOs than Daniel Sheehan who will examine some of the more recent developments in the UFO phenomenon including revelations by a former Pentagon employee regarding a long-running program that investigates UFO sightings. Danny will take us beyond the discussion of whether UFOs are real or whether UFOs are being piloted by highly intelligent, highly technologically developed but distinctly non-human beings from some extraterrestrial civilization, but instead to: What are the profound philosophical, theological, psychological, sociological and public policy questions that are now being posed to humanity by the “reality” of this non-human species here in our Milky Way Galaxy.
Daniel Sheehan is a Harvard College, Harvard Law School and Harvard Divinity School–trained Constitutional Litigation and Appellate Attorney. Dan served as Legal Counsel to Dr. John Mack, the Chair of the Department of Clinical Psychology at Harvard Medical School in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Dr. Mack was a Pulitzer-Prize winning biographer who, utilizing the scientific methods of medical psychology, conducted extensive research into the phenomenon of alien abduction. In 1994, the Dean of The Harvard Medical School called Dr. Mack before a special hand-picked Faculty Committee and ordered Dr. Mack to “defend” his publication of his book Abduction: Human Encounters with Aliens. A clear violation of his free speech rights and his status as a long-tenured Professor at Harvard University—as well as a highly-respected clinician—Dan successfully represented Dr. Mack before this committee, and secured his right to academic freedom.
TL;DW at the 45:40 mark provided by reddit user fheuwial:
New legislation (Senate Bill 2226, Amendment 797) will pass on/around December 22, 2023, and establishes a 9-person panel appointed by POTUS, with each person requiring Senate approval.
The legislation orders all IC and Military (DOD, Armed Forces, and Contracted) to turn over all information related to UAPs that is over 25 years old (from before late 1998) to this committee. Turnover deadline is 180 days from creation of the committee (latest mid 2024).
This committee is then required, within 180 days after document receipt, to make those documents public.
If something is deemed too sensitive (risk to national security), that document has to be assigned a controlled disclosure plan by a records review board and presented to the POTUS. This disclosure plan cannot exceed 7 years – late 2030, which is the length of time that the committee’s activities are authorized unless Congress extends it
Legislation gives the USG eminent domain (for example if contractors are withholding evidence)
Sheehan is showing this older version of the amendment in the interview, but the most recent is S.Amdt.836. Also, both versions of the Amendment actually list 300 days as the turnover deadline. See my other comment in this thread for other issues with Sheehan’s statements.
Edit: I think it’s important to note that all the journalists I can think of who are reporting on this topic and claim to have insider information (such as Jeremy Corbell, George Knapp, Michael Shellenberger, Ross Coulthart, etc.) have all stated that there is no “planned disclosure.” Instead, it’s complete chaos, with internal factions fighting over whether this information gets out or not.