The landlord had told them he wanted to raise the rent to $3,500 and when they complained he decided to raise it to $9,500.

“We know that our building is not rent controlled and this was something we were always worried about happening and there is no way we can afford $9,500 per month," Yumna Farooq said.

    • @Dkarma
      link
      -111 year ago

      I don’t disagree but what we need is stability. So far capitalism has given the US that. If you’re proposing a different system fine just make sure that while we move to it the perceived wealth of the country doesn’t take a hit and after it is implemented do the same.

      I don’t think it is possible from here. What we really need is loads more regulation and Corp criminals going to prison to start.

        • @Dkarma
          link
          01 year ago

          Largest gdp and arguably most stable economy of scale on the planet what are you talking about?
          See this is what I’m talking about. Just devoid of reality

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Coal Wars, Conscription, Red scare, Segregation, Civil Rights Oppression, Violence, Drug War, international chaos and war.

            What are you talking about?

            • @Dkarma
              link
              01 year ago

              Do we not have a stable economy? Are u kidding rn? Name one that is doing better.

    • @Aux
      link
      -151 year ago

      Capitalism is the only reason you exist.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        They said, not even knowing where I’m from. There are people who would be dead without Soviet Authoritarianism.

        And somehow that’s not what I’m advocating.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -11 year ago

          Well, would I be very far wrong to say that you are from Canada? Perhaps people are less ignorant than you think.

        • @Aux
          link
          -31 year ago

          A LOT MORE people would be alive and well without Soviet Authoritarianism or any other flavour of socialism/communism.

      • JokeDeity
        link
        fedilink
        161 year ago

        Yes, the only two options are capitalism and full on Chinese dictatorship communism.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So, this is a testy thread, but if you have a specific idea of what you do want I’m very interested. Capitalism is a weird solution but other than old-school communism (which was honestly a series of kludges masquerading as a solution) I’ve yet to hear another solution described in detail.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            You should examine the social and economic structures of the Anarchist governed areas in Ukraine and Spain during their respective civil wars.

            It wasn’t a given that Socialist movements should be Authoritarian. Lenin bears most of the blame for that (the bastard); Marx some.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I actually have looked into that. From what I can tell they never really had a well-defined economic structure, since building up the economy bigger isn’t a consideration when fighting for your existence, and used a market system for basic purchases of supplies. Modern Rojava is the same way.

              The Republicans were pretty close to winning from what I’ve heard, and if I could see parallel universes what they would have settled on after a victory would be one of the first few things I’d be interested in.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                Sure, they used mixed economics.

                The main point is that used mainly collectivist economics, and did so without establishing authoritarian societies.

        • @uis
          link
          -21 year ago

          You misspelled Chinese dictatorship capitalism

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There is also Soviet communism, Cuban communism, and North Korean communism. I’m sure one of those countries will happily welcome you with lovely high quality public housing.

          • JokeDeity
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I own my home. I’m just not a scumbag leech on society like you guys.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -51 year ago

              Do you think you’ll get to keep your house under communism?

              Mao thought that he could catapult his country past its competitors by herding villagers across the country into giant people’s communes. In pursuit of a utopian paradise, everything was collectivised. People had their work, homes, land, belongings and livelihoods taken from them. In collective canteens, food, distributed by the spoonful according to merit, became a weapon used to force people to follow the party’s every dictate. As incentives to work were removed, coercion and violence were used instead to compel famished farmers to perform labour on poorly planned irrigation projects while fields were neglected.

              • JokeDeity
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                Do you think I’m pro communist? I’m not from hexbear or Lemmygrad buddy.