• @rexxit
    link
    English
    -1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Education? Contraception? It’s not fucking rocket science. Every developed country in the world is at well below replacement rates. The idea needs to be promoted and not derided or conflated with eugenics (which it emphatically isn’t). Blunting the impact of an aging population is the most difficult problem.

    Edit: the most difficult problem is that capitalism demands perpetual growth, and billionaires and heads of state with a vested interest in growth would never allow the population to shrink without extreme resistance, like pervasive propaganda and outlawing abortion.

    • @Cryophilia
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Even if you’re correct, that will take HUNDREDS of years

      • @rexxit
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Sure, and so will slowing, stopping, and reversing anthropogenic climate change. Should we give up?

        • @Cryophilia
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          My point is, it’s on a timescale that it isn’t useful to discuss as a solution to housing issues.

          • @rexxit
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            How about this: housing in places with a shrinking population is relatively cheap and plentiful (math, right?). Developed countries could dial back immigration so that immigration + birth rate is below replacement. That solves overpopulation at the regional level.

            • @Cryophilia
              link
              English
              21 year ago

              So…fuck everywhere else? Sucks to suck?

              • @rexxit
                link
                English
                01 year ago

                We do what we can