California lawmakers approved a bill to decriminalize possession and personal use of certain natural psychedelics, including psilocybin, or magic mushrooms.

California lawmakers on Thursday narrowly approved a bill supported by veterans and criminal justice reform advocates to decriminalize the possession and personal use of a limited list of natural psychedelics, including “magic mushrooms.”

Gov. Gavin Newsom will now decide the fate of Senate Bill 58, which would remove criminal penalties for the possession and use of psilocybin and psilocin, the active ingredients in psychedelic mushrooms, mescaline and dimethyltryptamine, or DMT, known as ayahuasca. The bill also would require the California Health and Human Services Agency to study the therapeutic use of psychedelics and submit a report with its findings and recommendations to the Legislature.

  • @Willer
    -27•1 year ago

    Its natural so it must be good for u right, right… XD

      • @Willer
        -16•1 year ago

        ahahah very funny

    • Flying Squid
      11•1 year ago

      I think the point is that it isn’t bad for you, or at least not any more so than alcohol.

      As far as I’m concerned, we should either make drugs legal or alcohol illegal. The double-standard makes no sense.

        • Flying Squid
          1•1 year ago

          I think they should all be legal, but I also think laws should be consistent. If we’re going to make drugs illegal, include alcohol, cigarettes and caffeine or legalize the rest.

      • @Syrc
        1•1 year ago

        Depends on the drug. Stuff like Marijuana or those Psychedelics, sure. Cocaine and Heroin on the other hand… aren’t really comparable to stuff you can “”safely”” take for decades.

        • Flying Squid
          3•1 year ago

          So continue throwing people in prison for using them?

          • @Syrc
            1•1 year ago

            Prison is a different issue. I think they should seize the drugs and direct them to a rehabilitation center (or force them if it’s repeat offenders). Prison is for dealers.

            • Flying Squid
              3•1 year ago

              But what constitutes a dealer? Because we throw people in prison now who are intending to sell a single vial of meth for $20 (or whatever Meth costs). They might be addicts who are so desperate for money that they’re selling their own supply. Don’t those people also need help? This is the problem with the drug war- it’s too vague. And there’s no real way to not make it vague.

              • @Syrc
                0•1 year ago

                Even if it was someone desperate for money, they still tried to sell a very dangerous drug to another human. That’s not ok, in my opinion.

                That’s where I draw the line: if you’re only harming yourself you need help. If you’re trying to fuel others’ addiction, it’s jail. At most if it’s clear that the person has a huge drug issue you could force the rehabilitation center in that case as well (but again, the first time. If you still sell meth after that you’re asking for it).

                • Flying Squid
                  3•1 year ago

                  Considering I had a friend with cancer sell me some of his weed so he could pay his medical bills that month, I can’t say I’d agree.

                  • @Syrc
                    3•1 year ago

                    That’s weed. Weed is far less dangerous than the stuff we were talking about.

                    Also my view might be skewed due to living in Europe, so “selling to pay cancer bills” wasn’t really what I thought of.