Edit: Surprised at all the vegans in this thread. I didn’t think there were so many of you. I’m glad you care so much about animal rights, that you’re willing to forego eating them and using products made from them. If you’re not vegan and have moral objections for this, maybe you should look at yourself first and all the animal abuse you sanction by eating animals and using animal products. Did you know dairy cows have to be pregnant to produce milk? They’re artificially inseminated throughout most of their lives. I hope everyone complaining about this also complains about ice cream and cheese. Or else they would be hypocrites who just want to blame others but never look at themselves.

  • citrusface
    link
    English
    131 year ago

    I think you are proving OP right.

    • @surewhynotlem
      link
      English
      -31 year ago

      If OP is an ethical vegan, then they have a point. Everyone else needs to get over themselves.

      • @SCB
        link
        English
        -4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No vegan has a point if they’re opposed to growing new human organs.

        Human lives are more valuable than any animal’s life.

        • @surewhynotlem
          link
          English
          91 year ago

          That’s a judgement call. I mean, I agree, but it’s not objectively true.

          • @SCB
            link
            English
            -41 year ago

            Sure, but that’s my opinion, and thankfully the opinion of the overwhelming majority of people.

            Veganism is stupid

            • @surewhynotlem
              link
              English
              21 year ago

              Eh… why do you care enough to have an opinion about them? Do you know a lot of pushy vegans? If yes, the problem isn’t veganism, it’s pushy jerks.

              Veganism is fine because I’m not vegan so I don’t care.

              • @SCB
                link
                English
                -11 year ago

                There are vegans in this thread arguing against this life-saving procedure because it uses animals.

                • @surewhynotlem
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  So they have a low value of human life. It’s a weird point of view, but it’s not objectively wrong.

                  In their defense, have you met people? Are you sure that people are better than pigs?

                  • @SCB
                    link
                    English
                    01 year ago

                    Yes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          And why is that? Why attach value which can be compared to living species? I dislike such kind of ethical system. This is a flawed absolutist argument.

          • @LifeInMultipleChoice
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            I like that commenters keep saying animals as if that blanket term doesn’t include humans. Anyone who thinks people aren’t animals is not worth arguing with.

          • @SCB
            link
            English
            -71 year ago

            this is a flawed absolutist argument

            animals and humans are equal

            Lol