• darcy
    link
    fedilink
    -251 year ago

    you know whats better than reusable rockets? not going to space

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      371 year ago

      Going to space actually is important for a long list of reasons, has made humanity better and who knows, might even save it as we’re on a crash course with this earth. I know, I know, saving it is easier and better, but interest in doing that can’t be found

      • @Katana314
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        I feel like FFXIV Endwalker sort of mocked this; the idea that our future lies in the stars.

        We won’t get a better chance than here. Most sci-fi books expect space colonization within this millennia, which is a bit of a pipe dream and glosses over issues of atmospheric livability.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Heh Sci-Fi talks a lot about atmospheric livibility, like if anything it talks way too much about it.

        • Phoenixz
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Oh I know that a “future in between the stars” is going to be extremely complicated and hard, if possible at all. Going to live on Mars is already close to a pipe dream yeah.

          But that doesn’t mean that space exploration and travel itself is bad. There are loads of reasons why it’s good and necessary and we should invest more in it; take money from the military instead.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -31 year ago

        Is the long list written anywhere ? And are they practical right now to everybody kind of reasons, or are they “in this hypothetical far future” kind of reasons ?

        I know it’s cool and all, but we know how to shoot things into space already.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Going to space now. I know nasa has contributed to humanity. They are even planing to make a radio telescope on the moon. Spacex is… putting internet into space. Internet… into space. Instead of laying fiber and building radio towers, burning fuel to put a lot of satelites that need to be periodically replaced. They are even making the same mistakes that others have learned from. If that money went into proper research on just about anything… If that money went into fiber… If that money went to nasa, that is doing something actually useful. That money and work is going into burning fuel.

            And yea, i get it, rockets are cool. Space is cool. But spacex is not about advancing humanity or anything.

            • @space_gecko
              link
              11 year ago

              That money IS going to NASA, and then NASA decided it was a worthwhile investment to work with SpaceX to transport astronauts to the space station, resupply the station, and be an important research partner in autonomous landing systems, full-flow staged combustion engines, and many many more.

              The rest of the money is coming from commercial launch customers, government and private customers alike.

              Also, fiber internet doesn’t do you any good while you’re in the air or on the sea.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                There are already enough satelites for airplane and sea (and middle of rainforest) internet. Skylink, or whatever it’s called, was made for price gauged, infrastructure money laundered, usaians. Actually idk what it’s made for. I don’t see the point of private rocket companies at all. Guy was talking like elon, how we need to escape earth or something. Like it’s not our problem.

      • darcy
        link
        fedilink
        -271 year ago

        theres no actual reason more than curiosity. dont get me started on colonization of other planets

        • @flucksy_bango
          link
          121 year ago

          dont get me started on colonization of other planets

          Oh, please do, I’m curious.

          • darcy
            link
            fedilink
            -41 year ago

            its basically impossible to sustain a reasonably sized population on mars. like antarctica, except it takes like 18 months or something to get there. i dont believe that anything as dramatic as terraforming is practical or even possible. who will be allowed to go to mars? most likely only the rich. why dont we invest more money and resources into fixing our current planet? overpopulation can be avoided if we plan cities better, advocate contraception, etc. certainly more believable than sending a large portion of people to another whole planet. even if we could: should we? it would create a massive social divide. and who is running this whole thing? so far it seems like elon musk is the most mainstream advocator of this idea. would you like if your entire planet was owned by him. good luck forming a union on sector 7 of the oxygen plantation.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              141 year ago

              who will be allowed to go to mars? most likely only the rich.

              Living on Mars would be miserable. If colonization ever happens, it’ll be because there’s money to be made, and it’ll be poor people who are send to die in the Mars mines or whatever.

              • @flucksy_bango
                link
                21 year ago

                And it has less than half of Earth’s gravity and no magnetosphere. Anyone who lived there long time will have their muscles atrophy and be irradiated.

            • @flucksy_bango
              link
              91 year ago

              I dont believe that anything as dramatic as terraforming is practical or even possible.

              I’d also like to add that the amount you’d need to terraphorm Mars you could just… do to Earth. I think a lot of the points you made are valid, but some of those questions are pretty hypothetical.

              Idk, I think it’d be neat for humanity to go off planet and extrasolar. Even if it’s not a priority, you can’t really do that unless you’re working towards it. Doesn’t really matter to me regardless, I’ll be long dead before it happens.

              • darcy
                link
                fedilink
                -51 year ago

                you could just… do to Earth

                exactly. but spacex d***riders who believe mars is the future are retarded

                • @flucksy_bango
                  link
                  4
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I have no disagreement beyond your description of them. I agree that they’re sycophantic dipshits.

                  Like, Mars doesn’t have a magnetosphere. How the fuck do you make one of those? How do you make the gravity stronger?

                  • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
                    link
                    21 year ago

                    Right click on Mars and edit properties. Gosh it’s like you’ve never played Universe Sandbox.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          101 year ago

          Asteroid mining would mean no more mining on our planet, which is one of the most polluting things on here right now.

              • darcy
                link
                fedilink
                -41 year ago

                wow that narrows it down to only 2/3 of elements

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  31 year ago

                  Pretty sure that except for the ones that we have to make in a particle accelerator, we could get the full list.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  31 year ago

                  They can mine whatever we need, one of the first targets is titanium because it’s very abundant up there, scarce down here, and incredibly useful for all sorts of chemistry and manufacturing

          • darcy
            link
            fedilink
            -61 year ago

            maybe bc there are more important things to worry about on earth

            • nicman24
              link
              fedilink
              51 year ago

              put your phone down and start working the fields. you do not deserve anything that came out of space programs.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              You know there is a thing called division of labour right?

              We can have people working on multiple problems at the same time and various efforts might overlap and have a larger effect.

              You are now aware of this concept.

        • Phoenixz
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Colonization, if ever possible, definitely is a good reason

          Other good reasons are simply science. There are too many advancements made that would not have happened without going to space. Having satellites is a requirement now to monitor the earth and -if still possible- save it.

          Of course there are bullshit projects like star link, dumping hundreds, thousands of tiny shit satellites up on the sky even though it’s completely unnecessary… but that is a rich asshole problem more than a space problem

    • stevedidWHAT
      link
      141 year ago

      Darcy the fucking armchair astronaut over here 🙄