After months of secretive planning, and preparing the crew to defend their ship if necessary, the Royal Canadian Navy has transited the Taiwan Strait.

As HMCS Ottawa entered the busy and strategically critical body of water at sunrise, it was flanked by three Chinese warships armed with missiles and torpedoes. They mirrored Ottawa’s moves for the entire 17-hour crossing.

Canada made the journey along with the USS Ralph Johnson, a U.S. Navy guided missile destroyer, in what both countries describe as a freedom of navigation exercise.

  • @Chickenstalker
    link
    411 year ago

    China claims the ENTIRE SOUTH CHINA SEA. Imagine the US claims the entire Pacific ocean.

      • SolidGrue
        link
        English
        -4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Realistically tho, does the US not?

          • SolidGrue
            link
            English
            6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Ah, yeah. That was more my thrust… The attitude about enforcing open transit, because of course that’s what the US will do.

            e: dumb typos

        • @Moc
          link
          61 year ago

          No they don’t. Jesus Christ.

    • @Wakmrow
      link
      -571 year ago

      I’m genuinely curious what you think the US and Canada are doing by sailing warships through another country’s claimed waters?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Its a game of bluff. China can make all the claims it wants, but the waterway is traditionally open navigable waters, and rules are basically “do you want to start a war to stake your claim?” You can find many recordings online of western ships passing through the strait, and a constant back and forth of;

        “Turn back, you are in chinese waters.”

        “This is the USS Fillintheblank, we are in International Waters performing a freedom of navigation exercise.”

        “We order you to turn back now.”

        “This is the USS Fillintheblank, we are in…”

        • @Wakmrow
          link
          -71 year ago

          Yes so deliberately being antagonistic to prove the point claiming it’s international waters?

          • @severien
            link
            81 year ago

            Of course it’s necessary to be antagonistic towards breaking international agreements.