• @Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow
    link
    181 year ago

    There’s no way this will ever be economical at the scale we need to fix what we’ve done.

    • @9point6
      link
      21 year ago

      Obviously there’s more to it than just saying go, but honestly the economics of it should not matter whatsoever.

      It could cost every penny on the planet and still be worth it, the alternative is the end.

      • @School_Lunch
        link
        111 year ago

        If it’s less effective than simply planting more plants, then it would be pointless. It’ll take a massive amount of renewable energy to have any impact. That renewable energy might be better used to help burn less fossil fuels.

      • @Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow
        link
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is a nice sentiment that I agree with as a sentiment, but it’s not realistic.

        If it takes the equivalent of 1ton of carbon emissions to capture 1ton of carbon emissions, you are literally going nowhere compared to just replacing fossil fuels.

        So this technology needs to be extremely efficient, otherwise the amount of extra energy generation we need - on top of what we already have, renewable or not - becomes astronomical. So far it does not look anywhere close to being sufficiently efficient.

    • @CeeBee
      link
      01 year ago

      It doesn’t need to be