@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 1 year agodo as i say...lemmy.caimagemessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up11.05Karrow-down131
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imagedo as i say...lemmy.ca@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square105fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish29•1 year agoI’m glad you provided a link, because I would not have believed you otherwise. Take my upvote.
minus-squareSkull giverlinkfedilink14•edit-21 year ago[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•edit-21 year agoYeah, this is actually a non-example, but the concept is still valid. I think the real solution is to make use of OOP and go with a short, descriptive name that’s available in scope.
I’m glad you provided a link, because I would not have believed you otherwise. Take my upvote.
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
Yeah, this is actually a non-example, but the concept is still valid. I think the real solution is to make use of OOP and go with a short, descriptive name that’s available in scope.