The AIDS epidemic has killed more than 40 million people since the first recorded cases in 1981, tripling child mortality and carving decades off life expectancy in the hardest-hit areas of Africa, where the cost of treatment put it out of reach. Horrified, then-President George W. Bush and the U.S. Congress two decades ago created what is described as the largest commitment by any nation to combat a single disease.

The program, known as the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR, partners with nonprofit groups to provide HIV/AIDS medication to millions around the world. It strengthens local and national health care systems, cares for children orphaned by AIDS and provides job training for people at risk.

Now, a few Republican lawmakers are endangering the stability of the program, which officials say has saved 25 million lives in 55 countries from Ukraine to Brazil to Indonesia. That includes the lives of 5.5 million infants born HIV-free.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        171 year ago

        It’s funny to me that it’s socialist oriented spending, which in relation is a drop in a bucket, is so controversial but everything else is okay. It is not even funny how huge the disparity is. But yeah, it is such a no-go to do good things… man, the gymnastics involved to reach that level of thinking are so stupid, it should be comical

    • @SirWifflesprouts
      link
      341 year ago

      No one lives in isolation. Even if you don’t see the value in humanitarian efforts and even if in your selfishness you don’t have the selfish wisdom to support US soft power projection, you should be smart enough to realize that the US does not exist in an impermeable bubble. Global health improves health at home.

      • @Elivey
        link
        191 year ago

        I took medical anthropology recently and this is the best answer. Helping others, even if they seem too far away to affect you in your individualist isolationist country, will actually affect your health.

        • Narrrz
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’ve found it’s just an all around great policy in life to do good things for others, even if it seems like it doesn’t serve your interests, because these things have a way of coming back around in unexpected ways.

          or, in the case of a sexually transmitted disease, not coming around. who’s to say your next sexual partner mightn’t have gone on an overseas adventure, had a wild fling with a native, and if not for this policy, caught an STI?

    • @surewhynotlem
      link
      201 year ago

      Because humans like helping humans. Don’t worry, you don’t earn enough to be affected by this.

    • @Rooty
      link
      161 year ago

      “Why should I be concerned with my neighbour’s house being on fire?”

    • @anthoniix
      link
      131 year ago

      HIV originally came here from another country. If we weren’t doing this it would just continue to spread.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      why is the American taxpayer still on the hook for fixing potholes on other streets?

      Fucking idiot

        • Flying Squid
          link
          51 year ago

          I’m pretty sure you don’t know since you seem to think viruses respect borders.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              51 year ago

              Can you please name the condom brand that is 100% effective against HIV transmission?

            • @RedAggroBest
              link
              11 year ago

              Calling HIV an STD like it doesn’t have a hundred other ways to be transmitted really downplays the seriousness, which seems intentional to me.

              Don’t be a douche. We help others because we can and because disease is a global threat.

    • @mystik
      link
      21 year ago

      Because dead people in other countries don’t buy US exports.