• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Is that more co2 than 70k people going on a normal camping trip including driving, food, fire, etc? I have no idea how to interpret 100k tons of CO2. It’s not an intuitive number.

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      111 year ago

      Saying it’s like burning over 100 million pounds of coal does suggest that it’s a ridiculously large amount.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        I wonder What all they’re including in that count. I’m guessing it includes the fire and and gasoline burned at the event. But does it include transportation to and from the event? Potentially it even includes the co2 generated by farming the food that is there. It doesn’t say so it’s hard to really know how bad it is relative to other vacations.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          The protestors, who were ultimately dispersed by police, demanded the festival “ban private jets, single-use plastics, unnecessary propane burning, and unlimited generator use per capita,” among other requests.

          There’s some of it. Private jets and generators.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Is the unnecessary propane burning like some fire spectacle or some weird mad max style thing or what they mean?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      I don’t know. You can do some calculations here.

      There’s no way that many people are pulling off LNT. It’s also “Burning Man” not “Guerilla plantings of native trees Man”.

      I would have more sympathy if the BMP wasn’t actively blocking a geothermal plant. It’s this hypocrisy that makes me wish for rain and high decibels of Slayer.