• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    No it cannot, that’s not communism. China is as communist as North Korea is democratic. Just because a country calls itself something does not make it that thing.

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Countries can have multiple different systems in place. China for example, is an authoritarian communist state.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        Communism by definition cannot be authoritarian. So no, China is not an authoritarian communist state, it’s just a an authoritarian state.

        The only way for China to be communist is to give all people direct communal ownership of goods and services.

        • @[email protected]OPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          Communism can be authoritarian, though, as it has been in history.

          What’s your basis for this definition?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -21 year ago

            No it cannot because communism by definition must be a classless society. If there is a group above others that controls the state, it is no longer classless, and therefore not communist.

            And you know, the name derives from communal, so no communal ownership = no communism.

              • PugJesus
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Generally speaking Marxists and those operating on schools of thought derived or related to Marxism use Marx’s original definition of ‘Communism’ as the end goal of a stateless society, with a socialist state as the necessary intermediate point. This unfortunately gets muddled when people say “I’m a Communist” (meaning I’m forming a socialist state to ACHIEVE communism) and just end up forming a socialist (or ‘socialist’) state.