Why not both? Because you’re absolutely right that he got fucked on a bad gamble and then tried to save face, but I can also easily see him trying to buy stuff just to stick it to the left. (But in all reality again you’re probably pretty solely right lol)
I question if he actually got fucked on a gamble or if he was just inept and all of his decisions were largely a whim rather than based on some true data and research.
I guess the thing I have issue with is gamble to me makes it sound like he’s not fully at fault. What I see is some dipshit with kerosene and a match and he light a bridge on fire. Each failure is more fire thrown at the fire.
Why not both? Because you’re absolutely right that he got fucked on a bad gamble and then tried to save face, but I can also easily see him trying to buy stuff just to stick it to the left. (But in all reality again you’re probably pretty solely right lol)
I question if he actually got fucked on a gamble or if he was just inept and all of his decisions were largely a whim rather than based on some true data and research.
Well, being inept and acting on whims is a great way to get fucked on gambles.
I guess the thing I have issue with is gamble to me makes it sound like he’s not fully at fault. What I see is some dipshit with kerosene and a match and he light a bridge on fire. Each failure is more fire thrown at the fire.