“I can tell you that the people that are doing it aren’t the people who are coming here because they’re looking for a sandwich because they’re hungry,” said Ravi Ramberran, “It’s the people who are not afraid of consequences period.”

In the wake of the increase in dine and dashers, Ramberran said his restaurant has ramped up how they deal with it.

“We blast them on Facebook, we hold them, we make them wait for the cops…We do what’s in our power to do.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -10
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure why people say it is on the industry. It’s clearly driven by customer preferences. Try being a server some time and reject any tips that come your way. The customers will not be too thrilled.

    In fact, the restaurant business would be much better served by charging a higher price, even if that also means paying the workers more, as they can skim more profit off the top. They have no legal entitlement to tip money. That is a huge opportunity loss.

    Remember, restaurants – at least the kind where you pay after the event – aren’t really in the business of food. They are in the experience business. They provide an experience that allows you to feel “like a king” for an hour or two, and throwing some coins at the “poor servants” to show how “rich and powerful” you are is part of that experience.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Try being a server some time and reject any tips that come your way. The customers will not be too thrilled.

      I don’t think anyone’s suggesting tips should be banned. It’s just that tips shouldn’t be expected from each customer. Someone working at any given fast food restaurant (not to mention other low level service jobs) is working just as hard as a server at a sit down restaurant for the same pay. Why should I be expected to tip one and not the other? Also, why is 15-20% considered a proper tip? 10% shouldn’t be treated like it’s an insult.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why should I be expected to tip one and not the other?

        If you want get into the long history, alcohol service is unique in that it places liability on the server rather than the business. This means that they are legally their own independent agent and as such are free to charge their own rates. The tip separates what was sold by the restaurant and what was sold by the server. You will notice that any old laws on the books about tipping refer specifically to alcohol.

        This is why it has been traditionally customary to tip in establishments that sell alcohol, but not places that just sell hamburgers. But these days I’m pretty sure everyone will ask you for a tip and a lot of those old laws have been stricken from the books. It is of little applicability these days. Now, it’s mostly just because people enjoy tipping.

        Also, why is 15-20% considered a proper tip?

        Because that is what the market will bear.

        10% shouldn’t be treated like it’s an insult.

        So what if it is an insult? I think most everyone feels a little insulted when someone says “no” to their offer. But are you going to accept every telemarking scam and vacuum salesman just because you are afraid you are going to hurt their feelings?

        Lots of people get pleasure from tipping. And if a server can provide that service to them, great. If that is not you, just don’t pay for the service. You can’t win every customer, as they say.

    • NXTR
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      The industry decides that profits come before everything else. Large restaurant corporations could easily charge the same amount, pay workers more (with the add on effect of customers saving money by not having to tip), and take a hit to profits. Unfortunately, our legal system doesn’t punish businesses for not paying workers a livable wage or for using tips to deceptively price goods to overcharge consumers. Instead, it’s illegal to not abide by fiduciary duty in the pursuit of infinite profits. Due to this, I can’t see the tipping culture going away anytime soon. It isn’t the consumers who are driving this, it’s the restaurant industry.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The industry decides that profits come before everything else.

        Exactly. So why do you think they are happy to let their margins go out the door?

        A business is always incentivized to get paid as much as possible. Tips, however, are not paid to the business. They are paid directly to the workers. This means an, often substantial, loss in potential revenue for the business and thus is a huge loss in opportunity for the business.

        Again, what business willingly turns revenue away? The answer is no business willingly turns revenue away. Where did you even get the idea otherwise?

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          Businesses prefer tipping because they don’t need to provide benefits or scheduling for their employees. When they are slow, they aren’t paying for all the staff hanging around. When it is busy, they still aren’t paying their staff, but they have even more because people want to work for tips when it is busy. And when their employees act up, the customers are the ones who deal with it.

          Tips let businesses staff for peanuts while punishing their employees with terrible schedules so they quit instead of being fired and getting unemployment.

          Businesses love tipping culture.

        • NXTR
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I agree 100% especially given the behaviors that our current economic system incentivizes. I was simply responding to what you said about consumers preferences driving tipping culture instead of the industry.

          Although consumers in North America feel comfortable and good about tipping, this tradition primarily stems from the push to increase profits by underpaying workers and offsetting their deserved pay with the “merit” based tipping system. It’s a clever trick that feeds into the idea that “the harder your work, the more you get paid”.

          I don’t think this system will change unless profit is removed as the main factor in driving a business. Not to mention our legal system discourages and even prosecutes those who attempt to undermine the growth of a company against shareholder interests.

          The only places this works is in privately owned businesses where the people who run it have the authority to prioritize paying employees over profits. However, this opens the door for businesses to reduce prices by cutting wages which undercuts the private business used in this example and could lead them to go out of business.

          This example is basically to state that in order to eliminate the tipping culture and give workers the pay they deserve, the entire industry needs to change. One private company cannot be solely responsible for this change since another can come in and eliminate them. Now do I think this will happen? NO!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I was simply responding to what you said about consumers preferences driving tipping culture instead of the industry.

            Yes, that’s right. That’s the topic at hand.

            This example is basically to state that in order to eliminate the tipping culture and give workers the pay they deserve, the entire industry needs to change.

            The only thing that will eliminate it is customers losing their desire to tip. They are under no obligation to. They do so because they want to! They could literally end it right now. But why should they? They clearly derive enjoyment from it, as found out in that tip rejection experiment.

            Like you said, we 100% agree that the business would be better off charging more for the service (more revenue) instead of seeing the transaction split between the business and the workers (less revenue). There is no question that restaurant businesses, if it were up to them, would prefer to charge more for the plate over having tips. That gives them greater cashflow to work with and increased profitability on the margins.

            But you can’t get blood from a stone. If the customer wants to split the transaction between the business and the workers, there isn’t much a business can do beyond saying “no soup for you” – but that’s even less profitable than accepting a split transaction. Restaurants are forced to begrudgingly accept (if they want to be profitable).

            • NXTR
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I see what you mean. It is true that if the restaurant wage problem was solved tipping wouldn’t go away overnight, especially since many consumers in North America are used to the idea of tipping. However, I do believe it would slowly become less common as it is in other countries.

              In places where tipping is less common, customers view the prices as fully baked in. What they pay includes the price of the food and providing enough so their workers can live. There’s no guilt over not tipping. Some people may if they like the service, but most won’t. Additionally, the consumer is able to make a more informed choice since they are able to see the actual cost of their meal. They also don’t have to choose having the soup vs. tipping someone enough to live.

              I think my main point is that random patrons shouldn’t be able to determine whether someone can pay rent after working 12 hour shifts for a month. Letting the consumer split the cost of a transaction between the business and the worker is always a losing situation for the worker. The cost of the food is fixed, the business will always make X amount of dollars per transaction. Meanwhile, tipping is variable so the worker is never guaranteed a fair sum.

              If workers were paid properly then tipping would be viewed as an actual reward for doing a good job instead of a restaurant worker subsidy program as it currently stands. As I see it, the whole industry needs to change with actual laws backing up it up or else a few bad actors can ruin everything in the name of wanting to be profitable.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It is true that if the restaurant wage problem was solved

                Not hard to solve. Just stop tipping. Wages will adjust. Wages are only artificially low because the workers know they will make up the difference in tips. Take that away and they will demand more from the employer instead. Pretty simple.

                Letting the consumer split the cost of a transaction between the business and the worker is always a losing situation for the worker.

                Being the one who receives the money is always the winning situation. More revenue is better than less revenue. We already “100% agreed” upon this earlier.

                I think my main point is that random patrons shouldn’t be able to determine whether someone can pay rent after working 12 hour shifts for a month.

                Who is sticking around for a month if the tips aren’t showing up? Even a mid-scale restaurant will see tips into the $20-30 per hour range, and the classiest restaurants can go even higher. One will be jumping to a new job the next day if one particular restaurant is failing to attract a clientele that tips sufficiently.

                You make it sound like the workers are some kind of helpless blobs that have no idea what is going on around them.

                As I see it, the whole industry needs to change with actual laws backing up it up

                And what’s going to drive that? It takes the will of the people to change laws, but those very same people could just stop tipping. Trouble is that they want to tip.

                • NXTR
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  I am on the Artemis app for Kbin which hasn’t been updated to allow quoting yet so excuse the strange formatting. Each of the following paragraphs will address each point in order.

                  1: Wages will certainly not adjust if tipping went away, there would just be less workers willing to take those roles. It’s not the workers keeping wages artificially low, it’s the restaurants owners who do. Having workers successfully demand higher wages on an industry wide scale just isn’t feasible without unionization. Sure there may be individual situations where workers actually get a raise but I don’t see this being the norm. Employers do not have to capitulate to raising wages, especially if workers have no other options available to them.

                  2: Workers can get tipped and be paid fairly. It’s not a zero-sum game. Paying workers a livable wage so they don’t rely on tips is what I consider to be the “winning situation”. Customers can tip if they want to which means more money for the worker and if they don’t receive tips then it’s not big deal since their wages are enough to cover their expenses. This is in contrast to what we have now where tips are used to supplement wages. So with increased wages and with people still deciding to tip on occasion, the average worker would actually make more money, not less. In terms of revenue for the restaurant owner or chain exec, I could care less.

                  3: You are ignoring a variety of important factors in the assertion. Not everybody lives in an area or can easily move to one where they can make that much in tips. Not everybody can easily switch jobs and take a gap in pay. Not everyone is in an area flush with jobs where they can get paid properly. Sometimes surprise expenses come up and mess up your budget when you are living paycheck to paycheck. Basically, not everyone has the means to actually do what you are suggesting. If people could easily find a new job to make up for any budget shortfalls then we wouldn’t see bankruptcy and homelessness run rampant.

                  4: People don’t care about the actual concept of tipping at all. Who needs to drive this is restaurant workers getting together and collectivizing to have bargaining power over restaurant owners. I doubt workers care about tipping over getting paid a livable wage with the added bonus of some people still tipping. If workers withhold their labor then restaurant owners will have to give in. This will lead to actual material change for these workers. I know it’s a long shot but it is a viable way to achieve these goals without involving consumers and their tipping habits. All of this is achievable (unless restaurant owners do what hospitals do when they try to unionize and bring in outside labor at a higher cost (which ironically would increase wages for those people, just not for those who got fired for trying to bargain) within our current legal framework.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    0
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Wages will certainly not adjust if tipping went away, there would just be less workers willing to take those roles.

                    Guess what happens when there are fewer workers willing to work in a role…?

                    And restaurants will have no trouble paying it because they will be able to raise their prices when there are no tips. It’s like not like that $100 + $20 tip meal is going to move to being a $100 meal. It’s going to become a $120 meal. There will still be the same amount of money sloshing around in the system. All you are really doing is changing how it is accounted for.

                    Of course, that does put more control in the hands of the restaurant. Now it is their revenue, not yours. A restaurant taking what was a $40 per hour, tip in, job and trying to squeeze it to $35 per hour and keeping $5 for themselves is a real possibly, just like I told in an early comment. It is always best to be the one in control. More revenue beats less revenue.

                    Workers can get tipped and be paid fairly. It’s not a zero-sum game.

                    You’re limited by what the customer is willing to spend, and they are only going to spend so much. That is zero-sum.

                    Restaurant margins are already basically zero, so there is no capacity to pay workers more without raising prices. That isn’t going to happen without tips taking the squeeze. That $120 meal above is not going transform into a $144 receipt.

                    Higher wages and less tips, or a lower wage and more tips. Pick your poison. Of course, if you are the server, more tips is the way to go. It gives you the control, not the restaurant. And if you are unscrupulous, which I do not condone but seems to be the norm, it is easy to hide from the government. That’s a huge additional pay bump.

                    You are ignoring a variety of important factors in the assertion.

                    That is true. I completely missed the most obvious part: You are going to ask other servers what the tips are like before you even consider taking the job. So if a restaurant struggles to attract the right clientele, you’re not going to sign on in the first place.

                    Remember, at a good restaurant it is a $80-100k per year job (FTE). We’re not talking about hopeless souls here. We’re talking about top people who are highly intelligent and are especially skilled in dealing with people.

                    Who needs to drive this is restaurant workers getting together and collectivizing to have bargaining power over restaurant owners.

                    You want the largest benefactor of this system to be the one who brings the uprising? Methinks you’ve not thought this through.

                    Restaurants are most likely to lead the charge. They are highly incentivized to see that money become their revenue. And, indeed, many individual restaurants have tried (and failed, unsurprisingly) to do exactly that. A concerted effort by the entire restaurant industry, however, would no doubt be illegal.

    • @Wilibus
      link
      31 year ago

      None of what you said justifies paying these employees less because consumers are expected to give them money above and beyond the products/services that were purchased.