• bjorney
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    Most distros have a checkbox during the installer that will add non-free components. It’s a separate EULA you need to agree to so they can’t do it for you.

    You may not care, but the distro provider’s legal team absolutely cares about not getting sued for automatically bundling components with an incompatible license agreement

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -81 year ago

      The non-free components I’ve seen on installers are usually for Nvidia’s proprietary drivers. Not codecs.

      Sounds like legal panic if you ask me. There’s been no precedent for litigation on use of licensed codecs which most have been using either way prior in their builds and packages.

      • arglebargle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        MPEG LA is (now Via Licensing Alliance) has been active in collecting fees and defending patents. There is no reason to assume they won’t go after distros, particularly those who can pay given that they are willing to take on anyone else. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG_LA

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          They have never gone after said distros all those many many years they have bundled licensed codecs in their ISOs. What changed?

          • arglebargle
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Because those distros have (as we are talking about) distanced themselves from the patent encumbered codecs? When Google tried to get behind VP8, MPEG LA was right there to try and stop them by trying to get them into the pool.

            Edit: I should have said many didn’t Fedora opted out of compiling mesa with hardware accell, and it seems others did too recently. But that means it was there the whole time. I guess most distros, that have any money, are going to want shelter from lawsuits.