• @Gabu
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      My guy, theres evidence of an intersex knight buried with great reverence in, I believe, Denmark, about 1000 years ago.

        • @havokdj
          link
          English
          91 year ago

          Brother, their genitals

          You do know what intersex is, right?

            • @havokdj
              link
              English
              51 year ago

              I agree on that very much, but that’s not necessarily the point I was trying to make.

              However, there were indeed trans people in the past my friend, who were perfectly xx or xy.

        • sweetviolentblush [they/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Intersex people are individuals born with any of several sex characteristics including chromosome patterns, gonads, or genitals that do not fit the binary. Intersex folks are not inherently trans; but many were put through gender reassignment surgery post-birth and usually without their permission, so some do in fact, feel they are trans.

            • sweetviolentblush [they/them]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I’m not sure I understand. Where did I say historically intersex bodies mean they’re trans? …are you talking about the grave found in Suontaka, Hattula in Finland? Because they did DNA testing and discovered the deceased had Klinefelter syndrome, which to very crudely summarize (and I apologize if I say this incorrectly) is someone mostly male-presenting with an additional copy of the X chromosome; so XXY instead of XY chromosomes. The deceased was dressed in female clothing of the time, and in the grave they found jewelry attributed to women in that time as well. That’s why they theorize the individual might have been trans as well.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Trans individuals have been a thing since humans first existed. Historical texts are littered with references, and the history of LGBTQ+ is the same group fighting for rights since forever.

      Many cultures feel it is perfectly normal, and considered it expected that some people presented as different than their biological sex.

      It’s completely fictional that any gender or sexual minority is new or unique in the modern era.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          So then explain what you meant. Why is being trans before surgical augmentation going to be difficult, if you agree that you don’t need surgery to be trans. Make that make sense, cause it sounds like a transmedicalist shit take

          • HubertManne
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            It means there is little you can do about it at that point. Its like people dreamed of flight before planes but the dream was only realized once the technology was there.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              trans before surgical augemtation is going to be a bit difficult

              It means there is little you can do about it at that point

              Not every trans person wants or needs surgery, we are not a monolith of gender. Yet once more you are insinuating that surgery is like some wright brothers fever dream. For some, just living and being accepted as their gender is the goal. Implying that without surgery, there’s little you can do about it, is fucking rude at best, and transmedicalist bullshit at worst. You admit you know very little, yet here you are telling trans people about their experience. You should stop now.

              • HubertManne
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                ok. you have to understand there was cross dressing for a long time. so it gets back to is cross dressing trans or whatnot and maybe in some cases but not in others. So if someone identifies as the opposite gender of their sex but does not emulate the gender in any way it sorta becomes moot. Its like just in their heart.

                  • HubertManne
                    link
                    fedilink
                    01 year ago

                    stop? that was the first mention and if you had any nuance you would see that what im saying is if a person is trans and takes no action to emulate their prefered gender then are they trans. Basically what is trans then. Can you define simply and succinctly.