• @JustAManOnAToilet
    link
    11 year ago

    Shall not be infringed. As someone else pointed out there’s already a TRO, this is just a political stunt.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        A well balanced breakfast, being necessary to the start of a healthy day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed.

        In the above sentence, who has the right to keep and eat food, “the people,” or “a well balanced breakfast?”

        • blazera
          link
          fedilink
          -21 year ago

          It sounds like the balanced breakfast is the basis for everything that follows

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            So if you skip breakfast you don’t deserve the right to food? No lunch or dinner? Snacks ist verboten?

            It clearly says the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed. You know you’re wrong.

            • blazera
              link
              fedilink
              -11 year ago

              The hell is this weird strawman. Im not arguing against food im telling you how a sentence is written. As written, a balanced breakfast is the entire reason people have the right to food.

            • @SCB
              link
              -11 year ago

              You wrote a dumb shit sentence because the militia is the cause of the clause that follows in this stance, and in your example a breakfast is not the cause for keeping food but rather breakfast food.

              You made a bad example and declared it victory lol

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s not a bad example, it’s gramatically the exact same, and instead of admitting you’re wrong you’re choosing to stamp your feet like an obtuse child. You’re free to do so, but everyone else is free to read your shame.

                Edit: wait, different person. You’re choosing to stamp your feet on behalf of another* like an obtuse child, 'scuse me.

                • @SCB
                  link
                  -1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You’re posting in a public forum home slice.

                  If you’re intent on a private conversation, DMs are right there.

    • @SCB
      link
      01 year ago

      Your right to bear arms is not infringed by specific controls.

      You have a right to freedom of religion but local codes still come into okay for sacrifices/burnt offerings/etc.

      • @JustAManOnAToilet
        link
        01 year ago

        Biden-appointed U.S. District Court Judge David Urias said during a Wednesday hearing that the order violated the Constitution.

        “The violation of a constitutional right, even for minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury,” Urias said during the hearing.

        • @SCB
          link
          11 year ago

          I also disagree with the current ruling on roe v wade

            • @SCB
              link
              11 year ago

              It’s pretty great to be me, man. My life is kickass.

              • @JustAManOnAToilet
                link
                11 year ago

                Cool. Enjoy your Saturday night on here, I’m flushing and heading out.