• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    I’ve been playing on the beta build and the changes to local prices and urban centres feel a lot more realistic.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        They made Services into a local good (ie. It can only be bought and sold locally in a single state, the market access for it is effectively 0). This means that urban centres tend to hold more population since they are constantly in demand.

        They also made it so that Urban centres provide a small amount of Infrastructure, meaning that urbanization will help offset the infrastructure demand of factories and the like.

        • @nootstorm
          link
          31 year ago

          That’s neat. Have they done the same for transportation? Always seemed bizarre that railways could provide transportation to railway-less states.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Yes, they’ve done the same with transportation as well as electricity. It is definitely more realistic, but it requires a bit more micro since you can only switch buildings over to using those local goods once their production exists in that state.

            • @nootstorm
              link
              21 year ago

              Fab, thanks. Aye, does sound more micro heavy, but at least the entire population of China will no longer try to use my Lanfang’s railways and scupper industrialisation.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                You mean you don’t immediately open Lanfang up to immigration, thus ruining everyone’s standard of living for cheap labour‽ How utterly uncapitalist!