European regulators slapped TikTok with a $368 million fine on Friday for failing to protect children’s privacy, the first time that the popular short video-sharing app has been punished for breaching Europe’s strict data privacy rules.

Ireland’s Data Protection Commission, the lead privacy regulator for Big Tech companies whose European headquarters are largely in Dublin, said it was fining TikTok 345 million euros and reprimanding the platform for the violations dating to the second half of 2020.

The investigation found that the sign-up process for teen users resulted in settings that made their accounts public by default, allowing anyone to view and comment on their videos. Those default settings also posed a risk to children under 13 who gained access to the platform even though they’re not allowed.

Also, a “family pairing" feature designed for parents to manage settings wasn’t strict enough, allowing adults to turn on direct messaging for users aged 16 and 17 without their consent. And it nudged teen users into more “privacy intrusive” options when signing up and posting videos, the watchdog said.

  • PlasmaDistortion
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    As a Product Manager of multiple apps for a FANG company, I can say they were given multiple warnings before any fine is ever given. It’s not like this would have been on oversight. This was willfully choosing to ignore the law and thinking they would just get away with it. Companies also receive more than a years notice that they need to comply so this was again not a surprise to them.

    Fine amounts are also not a surprise. They are typically a percent of revenue and anyone with a calculator can predict a fine.

    • @EmpathicVagrant
      link
      91 year ago

      In the US the fine would be 10% of that, so they’re used to just getting away with slipping some pocket change and continuing with business as usual

    • JJROKCZ
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      If the fine is less than 100% then it’s just a fee not a fine

      • @severien
        link
        -21 year ago

        What? If you’d say 100% of profit, it would make at least some sense, but 100% of revenue doesn’t make any.

        • JJROKCZ
          link
          English
          71 year ago

          It needs to be a punishment or they consider it cost of business, it we say % of profit then they start employing Hollywood style accounting where nothing is ever profitable

          • @severien
            link
            01 year ago

            I’m pretty sure that TikTok can’t afford paying $400 million fine every month or so as “cost of doing business”, so they will fix the issue pretty quickly.

            • JJROKCZ
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Yep that’s my point, we gotta stop be lax with these oversteps

              • @severien
                link
                01 year ago

                Your original post implied that 400 million is lax.

                • TJA!
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  I do not see it in the article that the fine was repeating monthly until they fix these issues? Can you show me where it says that?

                  • @severien
                    link
                    21 year ago

                    That’s just how the GDPR fines work. They are going to get fined until they fix the problems.

                • JJROKCZ
                  link
                  English
                  -11 year ago

                  Because it is, they made so much more than that and have harmed these kids lives by hooking them into social media so early

              • @severien
                link
                31 year ago

                They are going to get fined until they fix the problem. The interval is not defined, it’s up to the discretion of the office.