• @SCB
      link
      61 year ago

      Seems like a pretty arbitrary number you picked there.

        • @SCB
          link
          -41 year ago

          CEO pay and worker pay aren’t intrinsically linked. Paying a CEO less doesn’t mean workers will magically get paid more.

          Workers are paid based on the market value of their labor cost.

          CEO pay should be capped, but because the market is unhinged from reality and needs a check for overall business health, not because of anything to do with worker salaries.

          If CEOs made $0 there is no reason to assume employee wages would increase.

            • @SCB
              link
              -11 year ago

              Why do you think so?

                • @SCB
                  link
                  -31 year ago

                  I’m not understanding how this ties into any sort of disconnect in regards to jobs.

                  You’re just ranting at me and not making any cogent points

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            CEO pay should be capped

            Probably the best way to do this is to have a union with a strong enough position within the company, forcing the owners to distribute the companies profits more equitably.

            • @SCB
              link
              -21 year ago

              They literally are. That’s how labor markets work.

    • @landlordlover
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Whats the actual worth of a competent CEO? Do you think you can calculate his value after reading two articles and some arbitrary numbers?

      I know I am stupid but not that stupid to think I can judge a persons salary within minutes.

    • Captain Howdy
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I’m honestly not trying to be antagonistic, I think I agree with you for the most part here.

      But how can you have an interpretation of math? Isn’t math objective? Isn’t math the key to all rationalization?I don’t understand how there could be “neofeudalist” or capitalist or communist interpretations of math.