• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Haven’t they been saying this shit for years? I’ll believe it when it happens. Toyota got a late jump on EV’s from what I understand, placing a bigger bet on hydrogen but that never really took off.

    EDIT: I should learn to RTFA

    • @expatriado
      link
      English
      171 year ago

      sink cost fallacy was strong on the hydrogen tech

      • Alto
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        For passenger vehicles sure, but hydrogen is likely the war forward for long haul trucks

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Maybe. Hydrogen is very expensive.

          Companies aren’t going to be interested in a technology that makes their fuel costs double or triple.

          • Lazz45
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Hydrogen is going to become more commercially available with it being pushed into the steel industry. It is being trialed for direct injection into blast furnaces in order to reduce carbon emissions, and so far it has been going well. It will need more active supply to make an impact, amd that is already in the works.

            Source: I work for a steel company who is trialing this currently, and hydrogen providers are stepping up their infrastructure as we speak

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              You’re actually using the hydrogen instead of inefficiently turning it into electricity and driving electric vehicles with it, so I’m not sure why you thought this was relevant to bring up in a discussion about hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.

              • @Eheran
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                Completely correct observation. 70 % conversion of electricity to hydrogen 50 % loss for storage 70 % conversion back to electricity = 0.70.50.7 = 25 % efficiency. Absolutely abysmally low. Unless there is a lot of renewable in the electricity mix, it is even worse than ICE!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Naah your cynicism is well founded, let’s see what actually gets delivered in 2026 before believing marketing claims with no proof in the article.