The historic UAW strike puts an exclamation point on more than a decade of efforts by Washington lawmakers to narrow the pay gap between top executives and workers.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    If the people paying did not believe they were getting their money’s worth, they would stop paying that much.

    No they wouldn’t. They’re the same people as get paid that much elsewhere. They have no incentive to lower the bar.

    • @SCB
      link
      11 year ago

      You’re mixing up who is offering what

        • @SCB
          link
          11 year ago

          Competing firms and to a lesser extent the CEOs themselves, all have input. It’s a market.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            It’s nothing like a market. Who do you imagine the individuals are who set the CEOs pay, and how do you think their pay is decided?

            • @SCB
              link
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Generally, but not always, the board will set a price range for CEOS. In smaller firms, the C-suite or President will, in some rarer cases the owner will have sole vote.

              You seem to think CEOs dictate their own wages, which makes no sense. That’s not how getting a job works.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                Exactly

                Furthermore, the boards themselves typically include fellow C-Suite executives, leading to elite back-scratching as well as a never-ending upward spiral of executive compensation as companies compare their CEO salaries to others.

                They’re not incentivised to get the best value for money. They’re setting the benchmarks by which their own pay is decided.