• Zoolander
      link
      English
      371 year ago

      Yes. And, I shit you not, his reasoning is that humans only have 2 eyes and not LIDAR and we’re able to drive so that’s all a computer should need to drive too.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        Which isn’t wrong… in theory…

        The difference is that we do not have anything even close to the human brain in its capabilities.

        …not to even mention that there can be upgrades to human vision. The reason our vision is how it is is due to energy efficiency and a small defensive surface area. A car doesn’t care about any of that.

        Doing something just because that’s how humans are, without further reasoning or as an argument in of itself is… ambitious to put it mildly.

        • @kadu
          link
          211 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Pretty much. They are parallell solutions, neither necessarily better than the other (though for a car radars and such probably are just objectively better). Like how wheels are better on asphalt, but legs are better on rugged terrain or forests (aka more versatile, but even then you can always augment legs with a bicycle).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Thats so god damn funny, theres 10 year olds doing arduino projects with more advanced tech than a tesla

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I believe he also tried to get rid of the sonar at one point a few years ago. It was a bit of a disaster iirc.