• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    Feathered T-Rex. The theory is that those useless little arms are actually supposed to be wings makes more sense. Do they fly? No, and neither do ostriches. Probably glide tho.

    • Zagorath
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      With wings that tiny I doubt a T-Rex was doing much gliding either, considering its size.

      • Rhaedas
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        Maybe falling with style? No, probably not that either.

        • Zagorath
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          That enabled animals to grow as large as they did, and it enabled massive pterosaurs like Quetzalcoatlus to exist. And even Quetzalcoatlus, which is much lighter and had much larger wings than T. rex, has been the subject of debate as to whether and to what extent it could fly. Both existed in the late Cretaceous period.

          • @unnecessarygoat
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            the atmosphere 66 million years ago wasn’t that different to the atmosphere today, the reason why pterosaurs like quetzalcoatlus was able to grow to such massive sizes was because they had extremely light skeletons. higher oxygen levels did allow arthropods to grow to giant sizes during the carboniferous, but it would have little effect on how large vertebrates could grow.

          • @Pipoca
            link
            01 year ago

            Dinosaur lungs are much more efficient than mammal lungs. Their bones are lighter, too.

            It’s also why birds can fly so much higher and be so much larger than bats.

            • Zagorath
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              I’m not comparing dinosaurs to mammals though. I’m comparing them to pterosaurs. Or more specifically, I’m comparing the specific dinosaur in question (T. rex) to the largest and most likely to struggle with flying of the pterosaurs, (Q. northropi).

              T. rex was, according to my quick search, at least 5000 kg. Q. northropi was just 250 kg at the higher end of estimates. The dinosaur had an armspan less than a metre, while the pterosaur’s was in excess of 10 times that.

              • @Pipoca
                link
                31 year ago

                That enabled animals to grow as large as they did, and it enabled massive pterosaurs like Quetzalcoatlus to exist.

                I wasn’t responding to comparing dinosaurs to pterosaurs. I was responding to the part about them being big because of the atmosphere.

                There’s a number of reasons we don’t have brontosaur-sized elephants. The differences in the atmosphere explains far less than hyper-efficient lungs and light bones.

        • Alien Nathan Edward
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          It wasn’t different enough that those chicken wings would let a 15,000 lb critter fly. It had more oxygen, which was helpful for letting critters get big (esp insects), but it wasnt physically thick.

    • fkn
      link
      51 year ago

      I like the idea that their feather ratio would be more like a chicken or a turkey… and they would just be there absolutely chonky birds…

    • @Pipoca
      link
      51 year ago

      One idea is that T Rex arms were used to latch onto prey. Their arms were short, but very muscular.

      The would have been about as useful for gliding as a rear spoiler on a car.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Probably glide tho.

      Something way back in my ancestry just cowered deep in a hole and I felt it.

    • @unnecessarygoat
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      tyrannosaurs didn’t have the advanced feathers seen on birds, so it wouldn’t be possible for them to have wings