• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    Oh, there is no implication about it: you need one hell of a justification to deliberately infringe on freedom of movement. It should be a criminal offense on the same level as “harassment” or “simple assault” to deliberately prevent someone from traveling. Each of these protesters should be charged with a separate count for each and every vehicle so delayed.

    And, anyone so impeded should be justified in using any force necessary to end that unlawful impediment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Reasonable person standard applies to all use of force, so no, not really.

        The right to protest does not extend to infringing on the rights of another. My right to protest does not supersede your right to leave your home and travel in public. I cannot detain you or deny your free movement.

        You do not have a monopoly on the use of public roads, sidewalks, etc. “Taking” the public roads or sidewalks for your private use is not reasonable.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -11 year ago

                No, that’s not a fact of life.

                It might be a fact of law, but if they have figured out some loophole that allows them to get away with it, the law can and should be changed to eliminate that loophole. And that’s the only real effect they will have: convincing the general public to adopt some authoritarian bullshit law that should not need to exist, because nobody should be enough of a cunt to deliberately impede movement.