• diegeticscream [all]
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    You’ve unfortunately been banned from lemmygrad, so I won’t be able to see any of your replies.

    “I’ll be happy to revisit that stance when evidence is presented.” isn’t the statement of blind faith. Your stance on Stalin, ironically, is.

    While you’re wistfully dealing with our separation, please think of two things:

    • Your own argument demands that you admit your stance on Stalin is wrong. You haven’t acknowledged that for several comments now.

    • You’ve been unable to respond to my initial question because you’ll have to drop your stance. Stalin cannot both be a power-seizing maniac, and someone who begs the Politboro to let him resign. We know the one is true. Can you accept your ideas are false?

    • @Candelestine
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      We do not “know” one is true. This is exactly what blind faith is.

      I can admit when I do not know something, I have admitted that I do not (and cannot) know the truth of if Stalin attempted to resign or not. He may have, he may not have. I do not know, but it sounds suspicious. I am not the one with the problem admitting ignorance though. I simply do not share your faith in the source.