None of what you said makes any sense or argues the points I’ve made. My point was about the intent of the author. If the author didn’t intend for their work to be freely given away or “shared”, then it’s immoral to steal income for them. Plain and simple. Address that point and stop bloviating about things that aren’t relevant.
None of what you said makes any sense or argues the points I’ve made
🤡🤡🤡
How could anything make sense to you if you’re not even trying to analyze what people say?
Don’t you see how contradictive your thinking is by reading my example with Mona Lisa? Or it’s not okay to pirate, if the author is alive, but it’s absolutely fine if the author is dead? Did Leonardo da’Vinci intended to share his artwork online? You may say that da’Vinci haven’t lost anything when louvre shared the scans, and that’s exactly what I already have talked about with you in the neighbouring comment branch.
Address that point and stop bloviating about things that aren’t relevant.
Stop trying to make a good face during a bad play. Discussions are made to identify the truth. If you’re trying to manipulate everwhom’s opinion or ignore your opponent’s arguments instead of stating ones yourself, then you’re nothing but a windbag. It’s either you ignored what I said or you’re really that stupid, in either way with each comment you more and more resemble a clown to me.
Your examples are dishonest and poor. Your first analogy was bad and so is this one. The Mona Lisa is a single piece of physical artwork. We’re talking about intellectual property that can be digitally pirated. If someone could 3D print an exact copy of the Mona Lisa, then your argument might make sense.
I’m done responding to you. Your responses are poor, they’re not well-thought out, they ignore the actual issue at hand here, and, on top of that, you’re rude and condescending. Go argue your bad analogies and straw-men elsewhere and stop trying to bend over backwards to justify your theft. You’re stealing. Just grow up and own up to it. I have and a lot of others in this sub have too. We pirate just the same but we don’t spout empty nonsense to try and make ourselves feel better about our moral shortcomings like you do.
Lol. I already have answered on your argument about “single piece of physical artwork”. Now you have just proven that you didn’t read what I said. Therefore you are a windbag, and your opinion has no value at all.
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
None of what you said makes any sense or argues the points I’ve made. My point was about the intent of the author. If the author didn’t intend for their work to be freely given away or “shared”, then it’s immoral to steal income for them. Plain and simple. Address that point and stop bloviating about things that aren’t relevant.
🤡🤡🤡 How could anything make sense to you if you’re not even trying to analyze what people say? Don’t you see how contradictive your thinking is by reading my example with Mona Lisa? Or it’s not okay to pirate, if the author is alive, but it’s absolutely fine if the author is dead? Did Leonardo da’Vinci intended to share his artwork online? You may say that da’Vinci haven’t lost anything when louvre shared the scans, and that’s exactly what I already have talked about with you in the neighbouring comment branch.
Stop trying to make a good face during a bad play. Discussions are made to identify the truth. If you’re trying to manipulate everwhom’s opinion or ignore your opponent’s arguments instead of stating ones yourself, then you’re nothing but a windbag. It’s either you ignored what I said or you’re really that stupid, in either way with each comment you more and more resemble a clown to me.
Your examples are dishonest and poor. Your first analogy was bad and so is this one. The Mona Lisa is a single piece of physical artwork. We’re talking about intellectual property that can be digitally pirated. If someone could 3D print an exact copy of the Mona Lisa, then your argument might make sense.
I’m done responding to you. Your responses are poor, they’re not well-thought out, they ignore the actual issue at hand here, and, on top of that, you’re rude and condescending. Go argue your bad analogies and straw-men elsewhere and stop trying to bend over backwards to justify your theft. You’re stealing. Just grow up and own up to it. I have and a lot of others in this sub have too. We pirate just the same but we don’t spout empty nonsense to try and make ourselves feel better about our moral shortcomings like you do.
Lol. I already have answered on your argument about “single piece of physical artwork”. Now you have just proven that you didn’t read what I said. Therefore you are a windbag, and your opinion has no value at all. 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
I did read what you said. It just doesn’t address the issue at all and is a straw man.