- cross-posted to:
- lemmyworld
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- lemmyworld
- [email protected]
I thought the point of a fediverse was distribution making it so that no one site becomes death star sized. If one site has ALL the biggest communities… What happens if that site goes down? Shouldn’t each site that wants one have a “Tech” community, and then those get aggregated into Tech? Wouldn’t that be a better approach? Doesn’t it make more sense that no one site has so many users the server can’t handle the load (been waiting for over a week for subscriptions on lemmy.ml to complete). Before someone feels the need to explain to me what they think a federation is, I’ve taught the subject. The point I’m trying to make is… Why do we keep pretending that being the biggest is a benefit, when it is directly detrimental to the architecture that we are using? #justanotheridiot #whatdontiget #federationday
P.S. before anybody goes out of their way to be offended, my hash tags are an attempt at self deprecating humor.
Dont new users choose where to sign up? Are you suggesting some kind of system for distributing user accounts as they come in or something?
Funny enough, I’m still reading about it but it seems interesting: Nostr
I downloaded an app for it and got it going but im still trying to make sense of it
I think a mechanism to force distribution would be great. But we would need something to ensure the user data isn’t lost if the instance disappears. But at the same time we wouldn’t want a half dozen clones of the same instance.