• Throwaway
    link
    fedilink
    -281 year ago

    Yeah, they used to be called Blasphemy laws. Still doesn’t make it excusable.

    • @pixxelkick
      link
      211 year ago

      I have no idea what you are talking about, to be honest. Never heard of those.

      But Blasphemy is extremely different from Hate. Canada, for example, goes into explicit legal detail on what counts as Hate and constitutes a Hate Crime.

      And Blasphemy has nothing to do with that discussion, nor have I ever heard of this concept, so either you are talking about something else entirely, or perhaps you have to link to what you are talking about?

      When I look the term “Blasphemy Laws” up, it brings up something that has nothing to do with Hate Crimes. Did you perhaps use the wrong term?

      • @magnusrufus
        link
        181 year ago

        Throwaway’s thing seems to be making shallow bad rightwing takes and backing them up with nothing of substance. I don’t think they are engaging genuinely.

      • @hypna
        link
        01 year ago

        Pakistan has a one of the more remarkably bad histories with blasphemy laws, if you’re looking for examples. I think they’re not uncommon in Muslim majority countries. Western nations had similar laws as well, but I think you have to go back a couple centuries to find them.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_in_Pakistan

        • @pixxelkick
          link
          41 year ago

          Yes I know what that Blasphemy Law is.

          But the thing is the person I responded to seemed to be talking about some other one, because we are talking about Anti-Hate speech laws, which is definitely not what you just linked to lol

      • Throwaway
        link
        fedilink
        -131 year ago

        Boiled down, theyre laws against arbritary speech. Sure they might define it, but those definitions always leave enough wiggle room to abuse.

        • @orrk
          link
          101 year ago

          by that logic, all laws should be abolished because all laws can be used for abuse.

          • Throwaway
            link
            fedilink
            -81 year ago

            If its either an easily abusable law or no law, Id rather no law.

            • @orrk
              link
              31 year ago

              you know drug laws are easily and constantly abused in America? so you would rather we have dealers selling cocaine to gradeschoolers.

              seems legit.

              there is nothing like a law that can’t be abused, but you huffed too much libertarian glue in the US.

        • @pixxelkick
          link
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No… one is a law against speech against a large entity of power that holds control of the nation.

          The other is a law against speech against fellow specific individuals.

          If you are seriously trying to equate “I don’t like (religion)” with “I think (group of people) deserve to die”, then you are on the wrong side of history mate.

          That would be a very bad take and I hope to hell and back again you are smart enough to see the difference between those two.