A new survey suggests that most Canadians feel news should be free and accessible for anyone, while also believing that media will find other ways to make money.

  • Nik282000
    link
    fedilink
    261 year ago

    How about instead of shakedown laws we pass some laws about malicious advertising online? People are less likely to block ads when the ads are not actively trying to fuck over their device.

    • @Touching_Grass
      link
      101 year ago

      I agree. Like right to repair laws. There should be laws that give people a right to opt out of all advertising online.

      • Nik282000
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Right to repair is a huge issue that most people totally ignore, it’s frustrating. However you can’t ban advertising online. it’s how operators pay for their servers. Either every site that provides a service has a subscription model or runs ads.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Or relies on donations, or relies on grants, or sells merchandise. All, along with subscriptions, are preferable to ads, which should be outlawed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          However you can’t ban advertising online. it’s how operators pay for their servers.

          And how do you think John Deere pays for its servers?

          No, not by ads, but by locking down their software such that only those who pay a fee to enable the features which rely on those servers are able to use those features. Right to repair is seen as a problem for them because it would open up the software configuration, allowing enabling of those features without paying the fee.

          Right to repair trusts that actors will act in good faith and pay the fee, even if it can be technically avoided. Why can’t ads go the same way? If you opt-out of seeing ads then surely we can trust that you will pay the equivalence by some other means?

        • @Touching_Grass
          link
          -11 year ago

          You can ban it. Its not my problem how they pay. Nobody asked them to take over the internet and turn ever pixel into an ad. Ban ads, these sites die and we get back the real internet.

          • Nik282000
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            You know someone has to pay for websites right? Like If no one donated to Wikipedia they would not exist. If you want to get back to “The Real Internet” you are going to have to start hosting all your own images, blog posts, e-mail server…

            • sik0fewlOP
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Did you just receive an email from Jimmy Wales, too?

              • @Nouveau_Burnswick
                link
                21 year ago

                He emails me every year and I give him money every year.

                Wikimedia got me through all my degrees/certifications.

                • sik0fewlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  The email said I hadn’t donated in two years, so I’m probably due!

            • @Touching_Grass
              link
              -2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Taking away advertising doesn’t take that away. It just means websites no longer free load by wasting our free time.

              If you want to get back to “The Real Internet” you are going to have to start hosting all your own images, blog posts, e-mail server

              No, you wouldn’t. But also not a terrible idea. We don’t need 90% of the content online. We need most of it scrubbed.