Alexis von Hoensbroech says the global push to decarbonize the aviation sector by 2050 will lead to a major increase in ticket prices unless governments step in to offer support.

  • Pxtl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    But why can’t you take a decarbonized plane?

    The high cost of a decarbonized plane (as you’ve rightly identified) is a good reason to focus on it filling in the shortest hop of the trip. Use high-speed rail for as much as possible, and then use the expensive flying machine full of sustainable synthetic natural gas or whatever for the last leg.

    We’re already talking about an incredible luxury that only the rich are able to partake in

    The most active traveller I know is a waitress. You can get a pretty decent all-inclusive week-long resort trip in Cayo Coco, Cuba for like $600CAD per person. I’m a very cheap guy, I didn’t even have a data plan on my phone until this year, and $600CAD is nothing for a once-every-few-years trip. That’s the difference between my yearly cellphone bill and a normal person’s cellphone bill.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Use high-speed rail for as much as possible

      No way anyone is willing to pay the cost of rail, I’m afraid.

      The most active traveller I know is a waitress.

      Who could also very well be the richest person you know. I have a restaurant’s financial records sitting on my desk right now. I know just how well those waitresses are paid after the tips are collected.

      Is there something notable about this person that wanted you to introduce her into the discussion?

      $600CAD is nothing for a once-every-few-years trip.

      Maybe if you’re rich. $600 isn’t something the poor get to just throw around for fun.

      • Pxtl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Maybe if you’re rich.

        something the poor get to just throw around

        Moving the goalposts. You started out saying only “the rich”. A single-income waitress is not “the rich” unless you’re completely bonkers. You can argue that such a person is middle-class, or working class, or petite bourgeoisie, however you want to classify her. But if you call somebody like that “the rich” you’ve taken a vacation from reality.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          A single-income waitress is not “the rich” unless you’re completely bonkers.

          It’s a top 20% income on the low end, and higher if she works at a high end establishment. If the top 20% isn’t rich, is anyone rich? Of course you can perpetually move the goalposts.

          You can argue that such a person is … or working class

          No doubt she is working class, but that says nothing about being rich or poor. The classes speak to capital ownership.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            It’s a top 20% income on the low end

            You’re telling me that Barb at the IHOP is making top-20% money.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              There would be no reason for her to work there otherwise. It is not like every other restaurant and bar under the sun isn’t also begging for servers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        those waitresses are paid after the tips are collected.

        That’s two different values you’re lumping into one.