People are taking this NDA thing out of context. Like it was just a NDA about what they are talking about in a meeting, most likely because of mutual interests and Meta using the code under license, and looking to fund and how to contribute. I mean, I don’t trust them or want anything to do with them really, but the world is not black and white. A lot of open source projects with no ulterior use are funded by Meta. It is not like a meeting means this is getting taken over. This knee jerk reaction is having a real, negative, effect on the developers. This is open source. We can always fork. There is nothing to pitchfork and picket about. It is entirely counter productive.
People are taking this NDA thing out of context. Like it was just a NDA about what they are talking about in a meeting, most likely because of mutual interests and Meta using the code under license, and looking to fund and how to contribute. I mean, I don’t trust them or want anything to do with them really, but the world is not black and white. A lot of open source projects with no ulterior use are funded by Meta. It is not like a meeting means this is getting taken over. This knee jerk reaction is having a real, negative, effect on the developers. This is open source. We can always fork. There is nothing to pitchfork and picket about. It is entirely counter productive.