According to an employee at the restaurant, the supposed priest urged employees to “get the sins out.”

  • SolidGrue
    link
    72 years ago

    Objectively, what is the difference between a “real priest” and a “fake priest?”

    • Flaky_Fish69
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      sanctioning by some governing religious authority. Like the Catholic church.

      alternatively, this guy wasn’t a cleric at all and only hired to pretend to be one. from the article it sounds like he was basically a paid actor.

      • SolidGrue
        link
        32 years ago

        You can send $65 to the Unitarians to get a card that entitles you to officiate weddings and administer rites. I did, and I have. Heck, for a beer I’ll listen to your sins and suggest you a few more while I tell you it’s OK not to stress about it.

        How is that any different? Asking for my atheist friends.

        • Flaky_Fish69
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          it’s “Official”.
          I mean, I get it. (particularly because I’m an atheist myself). but like Pretty sure the guy was literally just a paid actor trying to get people to nark on themselves. the employer is insane, though.

        • LifeInOregon
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          In many cases, a priest, minister, or pastor has received education in counseling, theology, and ministerial care. While one might discount the necessity of theological education, a good seminary will ensure that there is a foundation from which emotional support might be offered.

        • Zorque
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          There’s an authority that “official” priests answer to. They can face punitive action for breaking rules set forth by their established body… just like any other job.

          Sure, you got a certificate that says you can do a thing… but you don’t have a job because of that. If you did get a job from that, it would be somewhat similar, but it’s not.

        • Maeve
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          As in “Unitarian Universalist?” That seems sketchy, for them.

          • SolidGrue
            link
            12 years ago

            I got the card, tho. I did weddings!

            • Maeve
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              I’m saying there are different religions/sects that people consistent with Unitarian.

              • SolidGrue
                link
                1
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                I’m saying there are different religions/sects that people consistent with Unitarian.

                I’m not sure what you mean here,

      • Maeve
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        And a poor one, at that. They get $2000 each – after lawyer fees? And back wages.

      • kill
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        @Flaky_Fish69 what if they’re protestant and have no religious authority? i’m guessing the “religious authority” would be “the will of the people”? idk, maybe if the restaurant employees they could command the Priest title onto this guy

        • Flaky_Fish69
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          The vast majority of denominations have a body that decides what they as a denomination believe.

          Kind of what makes them a denomination. Unitarians are weird in that they specifically don’t give a damn.

          • Maeve
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Which is good. Their basic tenants, as far as I can recall, are “be kind, be responsible, everyone messes up sometimes.” It’s been a very long time since I attended a service, there are none in my corner of the world. Lots and lots of Baptists, Southern Baptists and Methodists that are breaking from the umc, though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I think in this case, it is because:

      1. The priest is not associated with any official church
      2. The priest is intensionally hired by the employer to spy on employees.
      • SolidGrue
        link
        12 years ago

        I like your rationale.

        We’ve defined Fake Priest. Nice.

    • kestrel7
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      I’m an atheist – but I think there’s a real ethical difference between intellectually honest true believing priests, and charlatans/predators who are cynically taking advantage of the trust some people put in the position. And it seems like this article is talking about the latter.

      • Deceptichum
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        Yeah with the real believers there is no chance for redemption, they’ll always be idiots.

        I’ll take the fakes preying on idiots over the idiots themselves any day.

    • snailwizard
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      The difference isn’t just that one is Some Guy and one is Some Guy Who Went To Seminary, the difference is that confessions are supposed to be kept confidential (between the person, their priest, and arguably God), not “confidential” (between the person and the priest, who then rats them out to the boss.)

      • Mr_Figtree
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        Yeah, a real priest understands that he is expected to die rather than reveal anything he heard in confession, while this guy was passing everything along to the boss.

    • @derf82
      link
      12 years ago

      Confession is covered by confessional privilege under both governmental laws and church law. What you say goes no farther.

      But a random guy can tell whomever whatever, and it seems the employer was deliberately trying to get dirt on his employees.

      So yes, there is a pretty huge difference.