Sjmarf to [email protected] • 1 year agoSorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1726arrow-down112
arrow-up1714arrow-down1imageSorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksSjmarf to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-square@HeyMrDeadManlink15•1 year agoThat’s funny… until I actually think about a 2.5in diameter turd… then I’m horrified.
minus-square@urinnerchild87linkEnglish7•1 year agoI think 2.5 inches would be closer to a soda can if we’re using references.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•1 year agoCan you please start using real units. Seriously.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoNo. 2.5" is in real units already. What’s your problem with size comparisons?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoI googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoThat doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
That’s funny… until I actually think about a 2.5in diameter turd… then I’m horrified.
Pretty much this size
I think 2.5 inches would be closer to a soda can if we’re using references.
2.5" in diameter is just under a baseball (2.8").
Can you please start using real units. Seriously.
It’s the same size as a cricket ball, 2.8".
No. 2.5" is in real units already. What’s your problem with size comparisons?
They should just refer to the caliber
I fire 120 mm high-explosive rounds
Relevant username.
That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
Relevant username
2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
That doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet?