Sjmarf to [email protected] • 1 year agoAstonishingsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up11.32Karrow-down129cross-posted to: technicallythetruth[email protected]
arrow-up11.29Karrow-down1imageAstonishingsh.itjust.worksSjmarf to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square114fedilinkcross-posted to: technicallythetruth[email protected]
minus-squareRayspektlinkfedilink5•edit-21 year agoLMAO I intended to write “last” but somehow typed the opposite. But your point is very concerning, indeed.
minus-square新星 [he/him/CPC bot]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoThe problem is that “first” and “last” have no meaning unless the conditions are established — first in intelligence or first in stupidity?
LMAO I intended to write “last” but somehow typed the opposite. But your point is very concerning, indeed.
The problem is that “first” and “last” have no meaning unless the conditions are established — first in intelligence or first in stupidity?
Yes