I thought the point of a fediverse was distribution making it so that no one site becomes death star sized. If one site has ALL the biggest communities… What happens if that site goes down? Shouldn’t each site that wants one have a “Tech” community, and then those get aggregated into Tech? Wouldn’t that be a better approach? Doesn’t it make more sense that no one site has so many users the server can’t handle the load (been waiting for over a week for subscriptions on lemmy.ml to complete). Before someone feels the need to explain to me what they think a federation is, I’ve taught the subject. The point I’m trying to make is… Why do we keep pretending that being the biggest is a benefit, when it is directly detrimental to the architecture that we are using? #justanotheridiot #whatdontiget #federationday

P.S. before anybody goes out of their way to be offended, my hash tags are an attempt at self deprecating humor.

  • Dav
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    Sounds like we need to get used to the idea of a more fluid content network. IT always says to back up your work, soon we’ll have to make backups of our communities too.

    • @BloodyFable
      link
      12 years ago

      What I dislike about this is the loss of knowledge every time an instance goes down, is there any mitigating factor for the loss of content to admin burnout, other instance enders?