This question’s on my mind because my coworker today mentioned they would vote for Trump if they could (mind you this is 2023, in Canada). I don’t generally have the talking points or the desire to fight about it, so I just deflected the conversation. But I often wish I was more strong-willed and could try to figure out why someone believes what they do and, if it’s invalid, then convince them otherwise.
Thus, I’m curious what you all would say or what you’ve done in the past!
Exactly. Kind in the micro, monsters in the macro. If you’re trying to raise money for the needy through the church but don’t want the government to help them at scale you really just want glory for your god and safety just for your community over other communities. Helping people is just an accident in pursuit of those causes.
What? Even if you engaged in charity solely to “glorify God”, why would welfare prevent you from doing that? Do you think welfare programs steal glory from God? Do you think that religious people think this way? (Outside of the literally mentally ill, no they don’t. They view charity as a moral obligation, not the only mechanism by which to “glorify God”. Just like any normal effective altruist).
“Just for your community over other communities”- Again, what? Improving the conditions of your community isn’t harming other communities. People in other communities also have a responsibility to improve their community, and there is nothing preventing one community from helping another.
“Helping people is just an accident in pursuit of those causes”-If it was just an accident, then surely it would be avoided? Let’s not forget that these causes are “glorifying God”, and either harming or ignoring other communities.
It’s okay to criticise trying to apply individualistic practices on a systemic scale, but you’re just fabricating nonsense to try to justify how you already decided to feel.