A northern Virginia mother who sedated her two daughters with melatonin-laced gummy bears before fatally shooting them was sentenced Friday to 78 years in prison.

Veronica Youngblood, 38, was arrested in August 2018 after shooting daughters Sharon Castro, 15, and Brooklynn Youngblood, 5, in their apartment in McLean. Castro survived long enough to call 911 and tell a dispatcher she had been shot by her mother. Jurors heard a recording of that call during a two-week trial that was so traumatic that jurors inquired about whether they could receive trauma therapy.

Youngblood told detectives that she planned to kill them and herself following a protracted custody dispute. Ron Youngblood, her ex-husband, told The Associated Press after the hearing that he had wanted to move to Missouri with both daughters but had reluctantly agreed to take only Brooklyn after his ex-wife objected.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -251 year ago

    I don’t know why taxpayers need to pay to shelter and feed this woman for 78 years… I get it, humans abuse the death sentence, but there are plenty of cases where it’s the answer.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -51 year ago

        That sounds like a system issue and a cause of groups attempting to make the death penalty less attractive. Once there is irrefutable proof that a horrific crime such as this has been committed, there is no argument thus far that has convinced me death isn’t the most logical punishment. I’ve heard them all, for…a long time. The only thing that keeps me from the 100% point is that, like I said, humans have a history of abusing it when it comes to minority’s or the ‘irrefutable proof’ part.

    • @CarbonatedPastaSauce
      link
      English
      291 year ago

      It’s never the answer because we can never be 100% correct. And the government putting innocent people to death is horrific.

      It’s also more expensive so the ONLY reason to put people to death is to satisfy bloodthirsty vengeance.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -51 year ago

        “It’s never the answer because we can never be 100% correct.” The only argument I partially concede to. We as humans abuse systems to achieve our own goals, and ‘truths’ are all a matter of perspective. “And the government putting innocent people to death is horrific.” Hard disagree. They do it all the damn time and at least it would be under the guise of justice in this case.

        “It’s also more expensive so the ONLY reason to put people to death is to satisfy bloodthirsty vengeance.” You seem pretty biased here. Any time someone tries to debate a point with the words ‘only’ or similar but then base it off perspective, is a flawed debate.

        • @CarbonatedPastaSauce
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          The fact that you don’t find government murder of innocents to be appalling means there’s no debate to be had.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            My hard disagree wasn’t with the actual gov murder of innocents, it was with dragging that into the debate.I did reread how I worded it and even confused myself so I can see I didn’t express it correctly. I guess a better way for me to have worded that is, if we’re going to wax apathetic about government murder of innocents, fix that problem separately. It has nothing to do with cases where there is obvious guilt.

    • SpaceBar
      link
      English
      151 year ago

      Because the killer are monsters, and we, the people, are not.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        It has nothing to do with the suffering… It is the most economical and straightforward way to deal with the punishment. If I had personal ties to it, I would probably want them to be alive and suffer Clockwork Orange style…