• @unfreeradical
    link
    11 year ago

    The fact that you’re unable to link to any of these “resources” says that you don’t know them.

    Have you made any attempts to learn about the subject yet, or are you still just arguing and whining?

    • chaogomu
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      You’re the one who can’t back up your position.

      All my research says that it’s biologically not possible to have a stateless society of more than 150 people. You’ve given me literally nothing to refute this.

      You’ve answered none of my questions about infrastructure or handling inter-community disputes, or really anything at all.

      All you’ve put forward is that you think that the entire concept of representative democracy is flawed for reasons.

      Reasons that rely on a very specific verbiage that you never bothered to explain, because you likely cannot.

      At this point, I can conclude that you have no clue at all about anything. The only links you’ve provided have been to Wikipedia articles on logical fallacies that you seem to be engaging in.

      • @unfreeradical
        link
        11 year ago

        All my research says that it’s biologically not possible to have a stateless society of more than 150 people. You’ve given me literally nothing to refute this.

        Perhaps one useful starting point for you would be learning about tribal societies.

        Tribes are non-state sociopolitical structures that unify bands or villages. Bands and villages are local groups that typically have less than a few hundred members.

        • chaogomu
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Again, tribes almost always consist of less than 150 individuals.

          You don’t seem to understand this one simple fact. I can point to about a dozen examples of small communities that are effectively stateless. They all contain less than 150 people, because that’s the number of relationships that a human brain can maintain before it breaks down.

          And a news flash for you, most cities and towns have more than 150 people.

          • @unfreeradical
            link
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Again, tribes almost always consist of less than 150 individuals.

            No. As I explained, the local groups that are limited in size to several hundred individuals are called bands or villages. Tribes are structures that unify bands or villages.

            You are not engaging the discussion or refining your understanding.

            You consistently have exhibited sloppy reasoning and have adhered to inaccurate terminology.

            I suggest stepping away for a few days.

            Then, when your head is clear, you might read about tribal structures. Once you have opened to a broadened understanding of the structure for various past and extant stateless societies, if you are still interested in the subject, then you might begin to review some of the materials in libcom.org and The Anarchist Library. Since literature on the subject reaches back about two hundred years, I doubt you will struggle due to a poverty of sources.

            If you later have doubts about material you have read, then you might present them on discussion boards. I think your asking sincere and informed questions, after some background reading, would be more productive than the present course.

            Good luck.