A federal judge has struck down a California law banning gun magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. U.S.

California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez won’t take effect immediately. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, has already filed a notice to appeal the ruling. The ban is likely to remain in effect while the case is still pending.

This is the second time Benitez has struck down California’s law banning certain types of magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.

  • Jeremy [Iowa]English
    4•1 year ago

    Bud the reason I didn’t reply with sources at first is honestly because you are a joke to me. Linking a law review article to me, you don’t know shit about law review. The scholarship on this is clear and overwhelming.

    Right - it has nothing to do with your having negligible awareness of the issue, getting caught blatantly shitposting, and scrambling to try and shore up your position with such scholarship as to apparently have not even read what you’ve posted.

    Totally.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
      -3•1 year ago

      Nah, you’re a joke. I’ve already read all the seminal articles and half of the bullshit ones.

      Now the shoe is on the other foot. You got caught shit posting, having only a superficial awareness of the subject matter.

      • Jeremy [Iowa]English
        4•1 year ago

        Nah, you’re a joke. I’ve already read all the seminal articles and half of the bullshit ones.

        Now the shoe is on the other foot. You got caught shit posting, having only a superficial awareness of the subject matter.

        Ah, I see - you’re left with personal insult and a half-assed appeal to authority in lieu of any actual arguments.

        I begin to wonder if you’re aware of the irony of calling someone a joke given the extent to which you’re just shitposting.