• @histy
    link
    English
    31
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • @Aceticon
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      Russia is doing “strategy” by Sunk Cost Falacy.

      It’s pretty normal in authoritarian dictatorship were the only unforgivable action for the dictator is “look weak” by giving up on something that has cost a lot to get (even if it is worthless).

      It’s pretty smart of the Ukranian leadership to use this russian regime weakness against them.

    • @jimmy90
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      isn’t there a strategically important road near Bakhmut that becomes available if you take the area?

      • @orrk
        link
        English
        101 year ago

        nope, I know that his was spread around everywhere by Russian sympathizers, but the reality is that Russia chose Bakhmut not because of its strategic importance but because they could supply it from both the northern and southeastern supply lines, the town is in a valley, its outside artillery range of the Russian and Ukrainian supply line Trunks, etc… what make the town special was the Russian propaganda because it was the one place they could adequately supply, and the ability of the UA forces to kill Russians in insane ratios

      • @histy
        link
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator