“Nobody uses water,” one man in a Dodgers cap said in Spanish when Maria Cabrera approached, holding flyers about silicosis, an incurable and suffocating disease that has devastated dozens of workers across the state and killed men who have barely reached middle age.

The disease dates back centuries, but researchers say the booming popularity of countertops made of engineered stone, which has much higher concentrations of silica than many kinds of natural stone, has driven a new epidemic of an accelerated form of the suffocating illness. As the dangerous dust builds up and scars the lungs, the disease can leave workers short of breath, weakened and ultimately suffering from lung failure.

“You can get a transplant,” Cabrera told the man in Spanish, “but it won’t last.”

In California, it has begun to debilitate young workers, largely Latino immigrants who cut and polish slabs of engineered stone. Instead of cropping up in people in their 60s or 70s after decades of exposure, it is now afflicting men in their 20s, 30s or 40s, said Dr. Jane Fazio, a pulmonary critical care physician who became alarmed by cases she saw at Olive View-UCLA Medical Center. Some California patients have died in their 30s.

  • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
    link
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s not wrong, but you missed the part where the workers are employees.

    They have sold the right to control the means and manner of their labor to their employer. It is the employer’s job to demand compliance, and the employer’s right to fire employees who do not comply for their own good. When a worker doesn’t comply and ends up sick, the employer has thus failed twice, the worker only once.

    If the employer was not responsible, the employer could acquiesce to unsafe work, reap the financial benefits of the workers’ negligence, and then disclaim the damage caused just blaming the worker.

    The employer has the right to control the means and manner of an employee’s work, it must exercise that right in a way that isn’t knowingly harmful to the worker. To do otherwise would be a bad faith breach of the employer-employee contract of hire.

    • @Hazdaz
      link
      -41 year ago

      Hide behind whatever bullshit you want, these workers knew the proper way to do things and didn’t do it. They fucked around and found out.

      • @Hazor
        link
        71 year ago

        Per the article, the workers didn’t know. The employers didn’t tell them of the dangers or provide the necessary safety training/equipment. From the article:

        “Dust was everywhere, he said, and he was given only a dust mask — one he said was inadequate for the job — to protect himself. Sometimes he brought a hose and tried to attach it to the machine to reduce dust, but there were no machines dispensing water as they were cutting, he said.”

        “Segura Meza had never heard of silicosis before he was diagnosed.”

        • @Hazdaz
          link
          -51 year ago

          All these products have MSDS available. Every last one of them. And because of stupid “machismo” bullshit, the vast majority of these dopes wouldn’t use safety equipment whether it was provided or not.

          • @assassin_aragorn
            link
            21 year ago

            It isn’t enough to have an available MSDS. I’ve just watched some mandated training videos on this actually. OSHA requires the following (in addition to other unlisted things):

            • Workplace hazards need to be clearly communicated. This includes a translation into the language that the workers generally speak, if necessary.

            • MSDS don’t just need to be regularly available, the workers also have to be trained in reading them and where they are.

            • The employer must provide PPE that is in working order and fit to use. Workers need to be trained in how to use these as well.

            It isn’t enough to say that the workers should have known. The employer has significant responsibilities above and beyond that. Even if the workers don’t know about the PPE or don’t want it, the company has to still provide it. The workers have to know that PPE is required for the work, why it’s required, and what could happen without wearing it. Most places I’ve worked wouldn’t even let you into the field nor a lab unless you met the requirements. It’s hard to say what’s company culture vs legally mandated however here – everywhere I’ve worked, someone would blanche and yell at you if you walked in with just your plain clothes. Even if the employees scoff at safety, the law doesn’t change. I suspect this is why employers typically make it company policy to wear the proper PPE – that, and the heightened scrutiny if something does actually happen.

            Funny enough, almost all of this is based on those required trainings I mentioned. Part of the training is informing workers of all this.